The Great Sphinx: An Old Kingdom Monument at Giza
Site at a Glance
- Rating
- 4.7
- Popularity
- Very High
- Country
- Egypt
- Primary era
- Bronze Age
- External website
- Open
- Eras represented
- Bronze Age
- Civilizations
- Egyptian
- Site type
- Religious
- Remains
- Sanctuary
On this page16 sections
History
The Great Sphinx is an ancient Egyptian monument at Giza, Egypt, built during the Old Kingdom, probably in the Fourth Dynasty around 2600–2500 BC. It forms part of the Giza pyramid complex and the wider Memphite Necropolis on the west bank of the Nile, and is regarded as the oldest known monumental sculpture in Egypt. The monument is commonly associated with Pharaoh Khafre, but no contemporary inscription names its builder, and the attribution remains unresolved.
Construction and royal attribution
The Old Kingdom was the period of Egypt’s centralized pyramid-building state, conventionally dated to about 2686–2181 BC. The Fourth Dynasty was the royal house responsible for the major pyramid projects at Giza. The Sphinx appears to have been planned in relation to Khafre’s funerary complex, although the exact sequence of construction remains debated. The causeway linking Khafre’s pyramid with its Valley Temple seems to have existed before the Sphinx enclosure was created, and part of the Valley Temple’s northern wall had to be removed to make room for the Sphinx Temple.
Khafre is the traditional candidate because the sculpture stands beside his processional route and because statues of him were found in the Valley Temple. Other proposed builders include Khufu, Khafre’s predecessor and the commissioner of the Great Pyramid, Djedefre, another son of Khufu, and Menkaure. The Sphinx’s original Old Kingdom name is unknown, so its first purpose and identity cannot be established from a surviving contemporary inscription.
Burial, revival, and the cult of Hor-em-akhet
The Giza Necropolis was abandoned during or after the First Intermediate Period, an era of political fragmentation between Egypt’s Old and Middle Kingdoms, conventionally placed between about 2181 and 2055 BC. Desert sand gradually buried the Sphinx up to its shoulders. During the New Kingdom, the monument became associated with Hor-em-akhet, meaning “Horus of the Horizon.” Horus was a major Egyptian deity linked with the sky and kingship, and the Sphinx’s eastward orientation connected it with the sun appearing on the horizon.
Around 1400 BC, the young Pharaoh Thutmose IV cleared the sand from the front of the monument and placed a shrine and the Dream Stele between its paws. The damaged inscription presents Hor-em-akhet speaking to Thutmose in a dream and promising him kingship if he cleared and protected the Sphinx. A damaged passage may contain the name Khafre, but the surviving text does not conclusively identify the builder.
Thutmose IV probably replaced eroded stones and may have painted the monument red. A proposal that he also placed a statue of his father, Amenhotep II, between the paws remains uncertain. Ramesses II may have carried out another excavation around 1200 BC. Amenhotep II built a temple northeast of the Sphinx, probably about a thousand years after its original construction, and dedicated it to the cult of Hor-em-akhet. A second, older temple associated with Thutmose I, dating to about 1500 BC, was also identified near the monument. Together, these buildings reflect the revival and expansion of Sphinx worship during the New Kingdom.
Graeco-Roman and medieval attention
During the Graeco-Roman period, Giza was treated as a destination for viewing ancient monuments. The Sphinx was cleared of sand in the first century AD in connection with Emperor Nero and the Egyptian governor Tiberius Claudius Balbilus. A broad stairway and viewing platforms were constructed in front of the paws. A restoration inscription dated to AD 166 records repairs to the retaining walls. Septimius Severus was the last Roman emperor specifically associated with the monument, around AD 200, after which the Sphinx was again covered by sand as Roman power declined.
The monument continued to receive ritual attention during the medieval period. Arab writers described it as a protective talisman of the desert. In al-Maqrizi’s account, it was the “talisman of the Nile,” whose power was believed to influence the annual flood cycle. Muhammad al-Idrisi reported that people seeking Egyptian government positions offered incense to the Sphinx.
Damage and modern investigation
The Sphinx’s missing nose was not destroyed by Napoleon’s artillery in 1798. Marks on the face indicate that rods or chisels were driven into it, suggesting deliberate removal, although the circumstances are uncertain. The nose was already absent in drawings made by Frederic Louis Norden in 1737 and was described as damaged by medieval writers. Al-Maqrizi attributed its destruction in 1378 to the Sufi Muhammad Sa’im al-Dahr, who opposed offerings made to the monument by local peasants. That attribution is a historical report rather than a securely proven fact.
Giovanni Battista Caviglia supervised the first modern archaeological excavation in 1817. His work exposed the chest and later revealed parts of the beard, the royal cobra ornament, the Dream Stele, remains of a shrine, painted lion figures, an altar with traces of burning, Greek inscriptions, steps, and a mud-brick ramp. In 1837, Howard Vyse and John Shae Perring drilled into the rear of the Sphinx while searching for hidden chambers. Their work caused additional damage but found no chamber.
Auguste Mariette excavated the monument again between 1853 and 1858 after wind-blown sand had covered Caviglia’s work. He exposed the large fissure at the base, subsidiary shrines, a New Kingdom statue of Osiris, and the temple south of the Sphinx. Mariette initially attributed that temple to the monument, but it was later identified as Khafre’s Valley Temple. Statues of Khafre found there reinforced the traditional association between the pharaoh and the Sphinx.
The Inventory Stele, discovered by Mariette in the late 1850s near the small pyramid associated with Henutsen, presents Khufu as finding and repairing a Sphinx that was already buried in sand. Since the stele belongs to the Twenty-Sixth Dynasty, around 664–525 BC, and conflicts with the archaeological chronology of Giza, it is treated as a late historical revision or possible priestly fabrication rather than reliable evidence for an earlier Sphinx.
Gaston Maspero cleared the monument again in 1886. He initially considered a predynastic date before accepting a Fourth-Dynasty attribution. Émile Baraize excavated and repaired the Sphinx between 1925 and 1936, while Selim Hassan’s campaigns from 1936 to 1946 cleared the entire enclosure and identified further temples, tombs, inscriptions, and votive material.
Continuing debates and conservation
In the late 1970s, Mark Lehner and Zahi Hawass examined the enclosure, fissures, and drilled holes. Old Kingdom pottery and stone-polishing tools were found in a crack at the rear of the monument, while their investigations rejected the extensive hidden chambers proposed by popular traditions. Lehner also argued that the ceremonial beard and religious imagery could indicate that the Sphinx represented a divine king or a deity in its own right.
The builder and original date remain debated. Rainer Stadelmann favored Khufu on iconographic grounds, while Vassil Dobrev proposed Djedefre. Earlier Egyptologists, including Ludwig Borchardt, E. A. Wallis Budge, Gaston Maspero, and Selim Hassan, also suggested different dates or sequences. Mainstream Egyptology continues to favor a Fourth-Dynasty origin while recognizing that the case for a particular builder is circumstantial.
Geological interpretations of the enclosure’s erosion have produced another disagreement. Robert Schoch, John Anthony West, and others argued that rainfall erosion required a much earlier, possibly predynastic date. James A. Harrell proposed wet sand, flooding, clay expansion, and salt crystallization as more likely explanations. Climatic and archaeological studies support the conventional Old Kingdom chronology and provide no archaeological evidence for a much earlier civilization at Giza.
Robert Bauval and Graham Hancock proposed an astronomical connection between the Sphinx, the Giza pyramids, and the constellation Leo around 10,500 BC. Mainstream scholarship rejects this interpretation because it lacks supporting textual and archaeological evidence and conflicts with astronomical calculations and the archaeological chronology of Giza. Edgar Cayce’s prediction of a hidden “Hall of Records” beneath the monument likewise produced no confirmed discovery. Other interpretations, including proposals that the Sphinx was a reworked image of Anubis or a later pharaoh, remain speculative rather than established historical explanations.
Egyptian government engineers repaired the head in 1931 after erosion caused part of the headdress to fall in 1926. The work inserted a concrete collar between the headdress and neck and altered the profile. Major repairs to the stone base and rock body followed in the 1980s and were repeated in the 1990s. Later work also replaced courses of limestone blocks around the base. The monument forms part of the UNESCO World Heritage Site encompassing the Memphis and its Necropolis landscape.
Remains
The Great Sphinx is a reclining figure with a human head and a lion’s body, carved mainly from the limestone bedrock of the Eocene Mokattam Formation on the Giza Plateau. It faces directly east toward the rising sun. The sculpture measures approximately 73 metres from the forepaws to the tail, 20 metres from its base to the top of the head, and 19 metres across the rear haunches. The head is about 4 metres high and is disproportionately small compared with the body.
Rock-cut monument and enclosure
Body, head, and headdress
The Sphinx is a monolith, meaning that its main form was carved from a single mass of natural stone, although separately cut limestone blocks were used in parts of the body and paws. Quarrying around the sculpture created a U-shaped enclosure, and stone removed during the work was used in the nearby Sphinx Temple. The lower body is made from hard but brittle limestone. The middle layer, which forms most of the core, is poorer-quality stone with many cracks, while the upper layer, including the head and neck, is harder and becomes purer toward the head.
The head wears the nemes, the striped royal headcloth worn by Egyptian pharaohs. A royal cobra ornament originally stood on the forehead, and a fragment of it was recovered during early excavations. A hole in the top of the head may have held another headdress element or crown; it was closed with a metal cover in 1926. The face is severely damaged, with the nose missing and the mouth and eyes badly worn. Traces of red pigment remain on the face, while yellow and blue pigment have been reported elsewhere, indicating that the monument was once brightly painted.
A ceremonial pharaonic beard may have belonged to the original monument, although it may instead have been added later. Fragments were found at the Sphinx and are now held by the British Museum in London and the Grand Egyptian Museum in Cairo. The beard was a divine and royal symbol rather than an indication of ordinary facial hair.
Platform and enclosure
The body stands on a stone platform within the rock-cut enclosure. The enclosure is lower and smoother in front of the statue, which can make the Sphinx appear to rest on a pedestal in some views. Its sunken position exposed the monument to burial by desert sand, rainwater infiltration, groundwater rise associated in the past with Nile flooding, and wind erosion. The body is more heavily eroded than the head because its middle limestone layers are softer. Wind and windblown sand, salt crystallization after condensation and evaporation, and possibly rainwater, wet sand, or ancient flooding all contributed to its deterioration.
The Sphinx lies beside the processional causeway from Khafre’s Valley Temple toward Khafre’s pyramid. The Sphinx Temple stands east of the monument near the rear paws, while Khafre’s Valley Temple lies farther south. Both temples used stone similar to that of the Sphinx’s body and consequently suffered severe erosion. The access route between the Valley Temple and pyramid included rainwater drains. A large ditch on its northern side was cut by the Sphinx enclosure and blocked with granite pieces to prevent water from entering the site.
Cracks, passages, and openings
Fissure and rear tunnel
A major natural fissure cuts through the waist and rear of the Sphinx. At the upper back it reaches about 2 metres in width, while its irregular bedrock floor continues downward through a narrower crack. In 1926, Baraize stabilized and covered it with iron bars, limestone, and cement, adding an iron trapdoor. Numerous other cracks extend through the body, including fractures associated with the original geological formation of the stone.
The so-called Perring’s Hole is a tunnel drilled behind the head in 1837 under Howard Vyse’s direction. It reached about 8.2 metres before the rods became stuck. Attempts to free them with explosives caused additional damage. The opening was cleared in 1978, when a fragment of the nemes headdress was found among the rubble.
Rump passage and shafts
A rear passage was exposed during Baraize’s clearance in 1926, closed with masonry, and rediscovered and excavated in 1980. Its upper and lower sections meet at roughly right angles. The upper section rises northwest to about 4 metres above ground level and ends in a niche about 1 metre wide and 1.8 metres high. The lower section descends northeast for about 4 metres to a depth of approximately 5 metres and ends in a blocked pit at groundwater level.
The passage is about 1.3 metres wide at its entrance and narrows to approximately 1.07 metres. Modern debris inside included tin foil, a ceramic water-jar base, cement, and shoes. Its origin is uncertain. It may have been cut by Vyse, or it may be an ancient exploratory tunnel or an unfinished tomb shaft.
A niche in the northern side of the core body appeared in a 1925 photograph and was closed during the restoration of 1925–26. Another possible opening lies beneath a large masonry box on the southern side. Opposite the northern hind paw, a square shaft cleared by Hawass in 1978 measures approximately 1.42 by 1.06 metres and about 2 metres deep. Mark Lehner called it the “Keyhole Shaft” because cuttings above it resemble the lower half of an inverted keyhole, and interpreted it as an unfinished tomb.
Temples, ritual objects, and access structures
Dream Stele and sanctuary features
The space between the paws behind the Dream Stele has a cement roof, an iron beam, and an iron trapdoor. The stele is an inscribed granite slab that may have been reused from a doorway or lintel belonging to one of Khafre’s temples. The Sphinx Temple and nearby New Kingdom temples contained painted stone lions and small sphinxes, votive statuettes, altars, inscriptions, and stelae. Some stelae depict an ear, symbolically encouraging Hor-em-akhet to hear prayers. These objects and structures reflect later ritual use of the monument and its sanctuary.
Roman stairway
A Roman stairway more than 12 metres wide once descended toward a pavement in front of the paws. Platforms at the top and rear of the stairway provided views into or around the Sphinx sanctuary. The structure was dismantled during Baraize’s excavations in 1931–32.
The monument is partially restored. Replacement limestone blocks surround parts of the base, the 1931 concrete collar remains beneath the headdress, and cement and stone stabilize major fissures. Repeated repairs have also treated the body and the stone platform.
Nearby sites
