Templar Churches, Castles and Commanderies: Buildings of a Medieval Military Order

From the Templars’ emergence in Jerusalem around 1119 to the order’s suppression in 1312, its buildings served religious, residential, administrative and military purposes. They ranged from houses and agricultural estates in western Europe to castles on the frontiers of the Crusader states and Iberian kingdoms. Their forms depended on where they stood, what work they supported and who had provided or commissioned them. Estate houses, urban headquarters and frontier castles required different combinations of rooms and defences.

The order also made use of existing buildings as well as constructing new ones. In Jerusalem, its early headquarters occupied part of the royal palace on the Temple Mount. Elsewhere, rulers and nobles granted land or strongholds, while the Templars bought property and developed it. Over time, these different places formed a network linking worship and local management with the order’s military commitments, especially in the eastern Mediterranean.

On this page6 sections

Buildings for a religious and military order

The Templars combined religious observance with armed service. Their communities included knights, sergeants and ordained chaplains, and members followed a religious rule as well as duties connected to warfare and the management of property. A Templar site might therefore need space for prayer and communal life, but also for administration, supplies, horses, training or defence. Which functions were present, and how they were arranged, depended on the site.

The order’s buildings were supported by gifts from rulers, nobles and other donors. These gifts included land, income and fortified places. Templars also reorganised some holdings through exchanges and sales, gathering scattered property into more manageable estates. Income from western possessions helped support the order’s work in the East, while local houses handled recruitment, religious formation and the administration of land. This system connected buildings far from the war zones to the order’s wider operations.

Construction relied on practical skills as well as patronage. Templar sergeants included builders and craftsmen, while major projects could involve successive phases of work. The evidence from individual complexes shows that a Templar foundation might grow or change as its military, religious or residential needs changed.

Commanderies as local houses and estate centres

A commandery was a local house of the order in western Europe, supported by land, rents or other income. It was part of an administrative and economic network, not a standard architectural design. The order received property from people of different ranks and used its houses to manage those resources. Farms and vineyards could produce goods for sale or local use, while brothers and other workers oversaw activity on the estates. Some properties were assembled gradually from separate gifts and then reorganised to make them more productive.

These houses also helped recruit and prepare members. Their religious life included communal prayer, and the Templars’ rules regulated daily routines as well as conduct. The scale and layout of a house depended on its resources and responsibilities; the daily needs of the community shaped its communal rooms and service buildings. Some sites were chiefly centres for managing land, while others formed larger religious and residential complexes.

Papal privileges shaped how the order could provide for worship. In 1139 Pope Innocent II confirmed the Templars’ right to have their own priests. A further grant in 1145 authorised them to build oratories and maintain cemeteries. These rights helped the order provide religious services for its members and people connected with its houses. They could also bring the Templars into disputes with local clergy, whose authority and income might be affected by religious services conducted independently of a parish church.

Churches for worship and institutional identity

Templar churches and chapels were places for prayer and the order’s religious ceremonies. Some were attached to larger headquarters or residential compounds; others served local houses. In the London headquarters, the church formed part of a complex that also included residences, grounds and service buildings. Chapel services belonged within a larger household of brothers, staff and visitors.

Some Templar churches used a circular plan associated with important holy places in Jerusalem. The Church of the Holy Sepulchre and the Dome of the Rock provided influential models. The Templars occupied the al-Aqsa Mosque precinct on the Temple Mount, which Crusaders associated with the Temple of Solomon; this association also informed how they understood the Dome of the Rock. Such architectural references carried religious meaning, but they did not make circular planning compulsory. Templar churches varied, and many aspects of a site’s plan depended on its local setting and function.

At Tomar in Portugal, the Templar church was a central octagonal space connected by arches to a surrounding gallery, or ambulatory. The exterior formed a many-sided structure, reinforced by buttresses. This plan organised worship around a central space while fitting within a larger fortified site. The building is often called a rotunda, meaning a round-plan church, although its interior core is octagonal.

Castles on frontiers and strategic routes

In the Crusader states and Iberia, Templar castles formed part of defence systems in regions exposed to military attack. They protected strongholds and routes and could also serve as centres for administration and economic activity. Some castles were granted to the order by local rulers; others were built or rebuilt as frontier conditions changed. Their purpose was not simply to provide a place for combatants to shelter. Holding a fortress could give the order influence over surrounding land and settlements.

In Iberia, the Templars’ role developed within the military and political structures of the Christian kingdoms. Their strongholds helped secure frontier territories, but the order also supplied forces for royal campaigns. Its responsibilities there were not identical to those in the Holy Land, where castles formed part of the defence of Crusader states and routes linked to pilgrimage and coastal access.

Tomar illustrates how a fortress could combine defensive, residential and religious functions. Built on a hill near the River Nabão from around 1160, the complex had outer defensive walls and a citadel with a keep, a tower that could serve both residential and defensive purposes. The round-plan church stood within the fortified compound. In 1190 the castle resisted an attack by the Almohad caliph Abu Yusuf al-Mansur, during a campaign that captured other strongholds in southern Portugal. The episode demonstrates the military function of the site without reducing the whole complex to a fortress alone.

Different building histories at London and Tomar

London’s Temple Church was built for the Templars’ English headquarters on a site they acquired when their earlier base had become too small. Its first section, the Round Church, was consecrated in 1185. It was followed by a larger rectangular chancel to the east, consecrated in 1240. The two-part plan reflects a building that developed over time rather than a single completed design. The wider headquarters included accommodation and service buildings, while the church served worship and, according to accounts of the order’s practices in England, initiation ceremonies.

During the reign of King John, the Temple also held royal funds and valuables entrusted to the Templars. The church and headquarters were thus connected to the order’s administrative and financial role as well as its religious life. Templar initiation was kept private, and later accusations about its ceremonies were used against the order. The allegations belonged to the proceedings against the order, rather than to the church’s architectural design.

Tomar’s Templar buildings developed on a different timescale. The castle was established around 1160, while construction of its church began in the second half of the twelfth century. Work continued into a later phase, around 1230–1250. The church’s central space and surrounding gallery formed part of a site that also had a defensive perimeter and residential functions. Its plan therefore reflects both religious reference to Jerusalem and the practical setting of a fortified Portuguese stronghold.

The surviving complexes also contain later work that must be distinguished from their Templar phases. At Tomar, the Portuguese Order of Christ took over the former Templar establishment after the Templars were suppressed. It added and adapted buildings over subsequent centuries, including a new nave adjoining the older round church. Much of the convent complex visible today belongs to these later periods, not to the medieval Templar castle. London’s Temple Church likewise underwent later alteration and restoration; bombing in 1941 destroyed much of its roof and wooden interior, and it was restored and rededicated in 1958.

Suppression and the transfer of Templar property

When Pope Clement V suppressed the order in 1312, its buildings and estates did not all pass into the same hands. Much of the Templar property was assigned to the Hospitallers. In Portugal, King Denis secured the establishment of the Order of Christ in 1319, which received Templar members and property. Tomar became the new order’s seat in 1357. Its later buildings belong to a distinct institution, even though they occupy and adapt a former Templar site.

The buildings’ varied histories reveal how the Templars operated: religious observance took place alongside estate management, political relationships and military defence. A commandery, an urban headquarters, a frontier castle and a round church were not interchangeable forms. Each answered different local needs, and later occupants often altered them. Understanding those layers makes it possible to distinguish the medieval order’s buildings from the institutions and architectural programmes that followed it.