Ottoman Taxation and Revenue Collection

The Ottoman state drew income from crops, households, livestock, towns and trade. Officials assessed dues in registers, assigned some revenues to cavalry holders and increasingly contracted other collections to tax farmers, while salaried collection continued alongside both systems. Tanzimat reformers tried to move more taxes to paid officials, but tax farming survived. A revenue assignment transferred a right to specified income, not ownership of the land that produced it. For rural land use and cultivation, see taxes on cultivation.

On this page6 sections

Surveys and assessment

A tahrir was an official survey and register of taxable people, land and income. A commission of officials and scribes, sometimes joined by a local judge, visited a district and recorded settlements, taxable household heads, bachelors, fields, crops, mills, animals and services. The register estimated dues in money or in kind. Officials could renew a survey after conquest or when the revenue of an area changed, then send the book to the capital for review and sealing.

The detailed mufassal register listed settlements, people, land and taxes. A shorter icmal summarized the income and the person assigned to receive it, while separate registers covered charitable endowments. This paperwork connected a village’s expected payments to the officials or service holders entitled to receive them.

Produce, household dues and extraordinary levies

A common agricultural tax, öşür, took a share of a crop, often in kind. The resm-i çift was a cash due associated in many districts with a farm unit large enough to be worked by a pair of oxen; the size of a çift varied with soil. In a law code issued under Mehmed II in the fifteenth century, this payment represented a group of earlier obligations, including days of labor and deliveries of hay, straw and firewood. A household could therefore owe both part of its harvest and a cash payment tied to the farm it worked; actual assessments varied with the district’s soil, tax categories and registered units.

The cizye was a head tax on eligible non-Muslim men. Women, children and people unable to work were generally exempt under the legal framework, although rules and collection methods changed. In parts of the Balkans, Ottoman officials continued older local head taxes and recorded them as cizye. Registers could identify liable residents by name and be copied for the treasury and provincial archives.

The avârız began as an irregular cash levy, often raised during wartime, and became a more regular demand as wars continued in the seventeenth century. Officials grouped households into avârız units that shared an assessment; in some settings, four or five actual households counted as one such unit. Related calls for provisions could be paid in kind: nüzül and sürsat were supplied as wheat, flour or oil. Communities sometimes founded endowed funds to help cover these charges, with residents sharing any unpaid balance when the fund’s income fell short.

Timar revenues and military service

Under the timar system, the state assigned specified revenues, commonly from agricultural dues, to a cavalryman known as a sipahi. The assignment gave him the right to collect particular taxes; it did not make him owner of the land or give him a free hand to invent new dues. Locally collected grain could be sold or converted into cash to support the horse, weapons and travel needed for service.

The expected military contribution rose with the value of the assignment. A sipahi had to bring equipped auxiliary horsemen, called cebelü, on campaign. In the 1527–28 records, 37,521 people appear in the timar army, with 9,563 assigned as fortress guards and the others listed as campaign cavalry. The system was most established in Anatolia and the Balkans. Egypt, Baghdad and Yemen instead used a different, salaried system of revenue administration.

Iltizam contracts

From the late fifteenth century, the treasury increasingly contracted collection through iltizam. A mukataa was a defined revenue unit, which might consist of taxes from a district, customs or another income source rather than a parcel of land. The state offered the right to collect its revenues for a limited term in return for a specified annual payment. The contractor, or mültezim, could keep a surplus but bore the loss if receipts fell short.

The award process involved more than a simple bid. A candidate stated the annual amount, the sum to pay in advance and the guarantors backing the offer. A local judge or senior finance official checked the proposal; the judge could visit guarantors’ homes and verify their means with witnesses. The report went to the central government, where officials reviewed it and issued a berat, the formal authorization to begin collecting. Three years was a common term, though some contracts ran longer. In early practice, contractors relied on local guarantors, often small-capital holders living near the revenue unit, who backed their ability to pay. Over time, these guarantor networks specialized into credit providers called sarrafs, increasingly concentrated in major centers such as Istanbul. The advance helped the treasury receive cash before the contracted taxes had all been collected.

Malikane, the life-term revenue right

In 1695 the government introduced malikane, a lifetime form of tax-farming contract. The treasury fixed the annual payment, then bidders competed over the muaccele, the upfront price for the lifetime right to collect the revenue. The successful bidder received a berat and continued paying the agreed annual sum, usually in installments. The contract gave the holder an income right, not ownership of all the land or households within the revenue unit.

When a holder died, the revenue unit returned to auction. A son could receive preference only if he matched the highest upfront offer; the right did not simply pass to him as an inheritance. The treasury received an immediate payment, while a holder who kept the contract over many years had a reason to maintain the source of income. Many malikane holders lived in Istanbul and did not collect personally: they appointed agents or contracted local collection back out through iltizam. A lifetime revenue right could therefore stand above a local collector, while the treasury still received its annual payment. The system was interrupted in most regions in 1716 and restored in 1717 as wartime needs changed, so its reach was not identical in every province or year.

Reform and debt administration

The Tanzimat decree, read publicly in 1839, promised regular taxation and the abolition of tax farming. In 1840, the government briefly transferred collection in core Tanzimat provinces to salaried officials, but the new administration struggled to gather, store and transport agricultural dues paid in kind, and iltizam returned. The contracted system survived alongside salaried collection into the empire’s final decades. Complaints over excessive and uneven tax burdens continued to shape reform efforts.

The first foreign loans came during the Crimean War: the state borrowed £3 million in 1854 and £5 million in 1855, pledging Egyptian tax revenues as security. Later borrowing mounted, and the government defaulted on public debt in 1875. European creditors negotiated a new collection arrangement. The Ottoman Public Debt Administration, established in 1881, received authority over designated revenue sources and sent their proceeds directly to creditors’ banks. Its 1881 mandate covered revenue sources yielding more than a quarter of state revenues, placing named taxes under a separate financial administration while Ottoman departments continued to collect the rest.