The Ottoman Economy

From its emergence in northwestern Anatolia around 1300 to the abolition of the sultanate in 1922, the Ottoman Empire joined farming districts, towns and ports across southeastern Europe, Anatolia and the Arab lands. Households produced crops and goods, merchants moved supplies, and the state drew revenue from both. The institutions connecting these activities changed over time: early land-revenue assignments, expanding tax contracts, regional currencies and nineteenth-century banks and factories each answered different demands.

On this page5 sections

Farming, land and rural work

Rural households cultivated cereals, commercial crops and gardens, and raised animals for food, wool, transport and ploughing. A 1572 register for Adana in southern Anatolia records wheat, barley, cotton, sesame and rice, alongside livestock. Farmers’ land and water rights shaped how this produce moved into taxes, household stores and markets. Irrigation also required collective work: in Ottoman Egypt, villages agreed to clear channels and repair embankments so water could reach downstream fields.

Much agricultural land was miri, meaning that the state retained its underlying title while cultivators held recognized rights to use particular holdings. A sixteenth-century tahrir, or land-and-revenue survey, recorded villages, households, fields, crops and expected dues. A timar then assigned specified revenues, often from several villages, to a sipahi, a mounted cavalryman. The assignment helped support his service and the auxiliary horsemen he equipped; it did not make him owner of every farm or allow him to set new taxes. These arrangements were strongest in core Anatolian and Balkan provinces. Egypt, Baghdad and Yemen relied more on salaried officials and other revenue systems.

The distinction between land title and the right to work a holding remained important when the system changed. The 1858 Land Code organized rules for registration, transfer and inheritance of miri use-rights. In western Anatolia, large farms, or çiftliks, used different labor arrangements. An account of estates associated with Kara Osmanzade Hüseyin Ağa describes fields cultivated by paid workers alongside plots rented to villagers for cash or a share of the harvest. A single estate could therefore combine wage labor and tenancy, linking village households to production managed by a large landholder.

Taxes and the treasury

Taxes and dues included charges on agricultural produce, land use, households, livestock and trade. A detailed survey could name taxable residents and list crops or animals, while a summary recorded the revenue available to the treasury or an assigned service holder. Some dues were paid in grain or another product; others were assessed in money. For example, the öşür was a share of agricultural output, while the resm-i çift was a cash due linked in many districts to a full farm unit. The size and terms varied by province and soil.

As the state needed cash before all taxes had been collected, it expanded iltizam, or tax farming. A defined revenue source, called a mukataa, might be customs, district taxes or another income stream. A contractor promised an annual payment to the treasury and collected the revenues for a limited term, gaining any surplus but bearing a shortfall. In 1695 the malikane system offered a life-term collection right: bidders competed over an upfront payment, while the yearly amount owed to the treasury was set in advance. Holders often financed that payment through moneylenders and employed local agents to collect taxes. This brought immediate funds to the government and tied investors to the future yield of a revenue source.

By the nineteenth century, reformers sought more direct collection through salaried officials, but contracted collection continued alongside it. War also changed the treasury’s needs. The state began borrowing abroad during the Crimean War in 1854, suspended foreign debt payments in 1875, and in 1881 assigned specified revenue streams to the Ottoman Public Debt Administration for debt service. Finance thus connected village production, contract holders, lenders and government departments.

Money, credit and banks

The silver akçe served both as a coin and as a unit for writing prices and taxes. Actual payment could involve other coins: foreign silver circulated in some markets, while Egypt and parts of the eastern provinces retained their own important units. This matters because an amount written in akçes did not always mean that a buyer handed over that exact coin. In 1585–86, the government reduced the silver content of the akçe by about 44 percent, changing the value of recorded sums and provoking disputes over pay and debt.

Credit worked through personal loans, commercial partnerships and charitable foundations as well as banks. In a mudaraba, an investor entrusted money or goods to an agent for trade; they shared the profit by agreement, while the investor bore a loss of capital and the agent lost the time and work invested. Court records from early-seventeenth-century Kayseri and nearby Anatolian towns document borrowing and lending among relatives and other residents, including women. A cash waqf was a charitable endowment whose trustee lent its money and used the return to fund the founder’s specified service or institution.

The nineteenth century added new instruments. The 1840 kaime was government paper that circulated as money and also paid interest. In 1844, the gold lira was fixed at 100 silver kuruş, creating an official gold-and-silver standard. During the Crimean War, the first foreign loan added another source of state finance; the Ottoman Bank, founded in 1856 and reorganized as the Imperial Ottoman Bank in 1863, later handled government banking and note issue. These institutions grew alongside moneychangers, court-recorded loans and older credit networks.

Trade, ports and markets

Towns required food, fuel and manufactured goods, linking local producers to regional markets and the capital. Istanbul depended on grain shipped from other provinces. At the Unkapan landing on the Golden Horn, ships unloaded grain beside a public weighing scale and large storage magazine; from there supplies moved toward the court, military, religious foundations and city residents. In the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries, officials used narh, a schedule of regulated prices, to address shortages and unfair dealing while setting prices and material costs for some artisans.

Inland caravans and port merchants handled different stages of longer trade. A merchant could store goods at a town market or inn, arrange a further sale, and use a partnership or payment instrument to settle accounts at a distance. The 1838 Convention of Balta Liman changed the terms of British trade: it allowed British merchants to buy Ottoman produce throughout the empire and abolished state monopolies and local permits for purchasing and moving goods. Exported Ottoman goods still paid specified interior and export duties. During the later nineteenth century, steam transport and railways connected selected agricultural districts more directly with export ports, while internal trade continued to provision towns and provinces.

Crafts, guilds and manufacturing

Artisans organised work through households, rented shops, larger workshops and state factories. In some urban trades, an apprentice learned by assisting a master, then became a paid journeyman who helped supervise younger workers. A skilled journeyman could become a master after a ceremony recognized by the craft association. Its kethüda, or administrator, represented members to authorities and helped address disputes. Regulations and narh prices connected artisans’ access to raw materials with the cost of finished goods.

Tools and premises could have legal and financial value of their own. Gedik first referred in some contexts to equipment a tenant installed in a shop, such as shelves or chests, and rights tied to its use. Later it could also denote a recognized privilege to practice a trade. The shift linked a craft’s tools and workplace to permission to enter a regulated occupation.

Textile production shows how work could be divided by task and location. Wool was sorted, spun into thread and woven into cloth or carpets; in Istanbul’s Feshane, an imperial factory producing fezzes, brimless felt caps, wage ledgers grouped workers by department, while women also knitted from home within a supervised production network. State factories served military and palace needs and sold goods into domestic markets, while household makers, private workshops and market artisans continued to produce for other customers. The empire’s manufacturing history therefore followed several connected workplaces, from a family workshop to a centrally managed factory.