Nabataean Towns, Homes and Living Conditions

Nabataean settlements included substantial towns, smaller agricultural communities and stopping places along desert routes. In Petra, people lived among streets, temples and tombs in a landscape of rocky slopes and narrow valleys. Their domestic buildings provided places to store supplies, prepare food, receive visitors and carry out work. Housing ranged from relatively simple residential complexes to mansions with painted rooms and private bathing facilities.

The independent kingdom was annexed by Rome in 106 CE. Excavations often uncover buildings that continued in use or were rebuilt afterwards, so their rooms tell a history extending beyond the kings. The first-century mansion on Petra’s ez-Zantur terrace and the residential areas on the city’s North Ridge offer particularly useful examples of how spaces were arranged and used.

On this page6 sections

Towns and their surrounding countryside

Petra’s inhabitants depended on a productive hinterland and the movement of supplies into the city. Grain, fruit, animals and fuel had to reach households as well as temples and public buildings. Dams, channels and cisterns helped support permanent settlement in a region where water was highly seasonal. A town brought together people who cultivated food, transported it, made goods, built structures and supported religious institutions.

Its inhabited area was larger and more varied than the famous rock-cut facades suggest. Houses stood on terraces above the centre, and neighbourhoods developed around the North Ridge. Some burials lay close to residential occupation in the first centuries BCE and CE. A rock-cut tomb was a space for the dead, while a constructed house accommodated daily activities; the two could occupy the same neighbourhood without performing the same function.

Outside towns, settlement included farmsteads and facilities supporting travel. At Neqarot in the Negev, a modest residential structure dating to the late first century BCE and early first century CE stood beside the route west from Petra. Its rubbish contained food remains, lamps, pottery and glass. This setting connected a small occupied building with travellers and the supply network of the desert road.

Building with local materials

Stone was well suited to many parts of Petra, where builders could cut and assemble blocks while using the slopes to establish terraces. Constructed houses differed from chambers carved wholly into rock: their walls, roofs and openings were assembled, and their layout could be altered through new partitions or additions. Thick masonry and enclosed rooms also created sheltered interiors in a landscape exposed to sun and seasonal cold.

Other places relied more heavily on earth construction. At Hegra, the inhabited centre occupied the plain between the sandstone outcrops containing tombs. Mudbrick, made by shaping moist earth and leaving the bricks to dry, was an important building material. Builders shaped bricks from available soil. Walls of this kind needed upkeep, particularly where water could erode their surfaces.

The form of a settlement also depended on work and movement. Cultivated plots, wells and paths connected houses to their surroundings. Mobile herding continued alongside permanent occupation in Nabataean territory. Building towns therefore added settled centres to a varied pattern of life that still included people moving with animals and goods.

A mansion designed for residents and guests

The large house excavated at ez-Zantur IV was built in the early first century CE. Its plan combined reception halls, private rooms and service spaces around courtyards. A visitor entering from the north reached a courtyard from which passages led into other parts of the building. Corridors and doorways helped organise access, allowing guests to be received without bringing every household activity into the same room.

Formal rooms displayed the owner’s resources. Painted plaster created the appearance of elaborate architecture, and moulded stucco supplied raised decoration. Stone paving and a geometric mosaic gave selected rooms further distinction. The interior thus presented colour and ornament as well as the plain structural stone visible in many ruins today.

Food preparation was incorporated into the plan. Kitchens served different sectors, and an eastern service wing communicated with the reception area through a corridor. Some rooms are interpreted as storage spaces. Carrying provisions, preparing meals and serving guests involved movement through these connections. The house’s arrangement made hospitality part of a larger domestic operation.

Heat, bathing and the work behind comfort

The mansion also had a winter living room with a suspended floor supported on small columns. A furnace supplied heat beneath it. This arrangement, commonly called a hypocaust, warmed a room through the space below its floor rather than by placing an open fire among the occupants. Operating it required a fire, a fuel supply and someone to tend the heating.

Bathing facilities occupied another part of the building. A heated bathing room had its own furnace, and a nearby room stored fuel for the heating installations. Warmth and bathing therefore depended on service spaces as well as decorated rooms. The comfort available in this wealthy residence required the household to maintain its furnaces, fuel stores and supply of water.

First-century remains on the North Ridge also include a complex with a heated bath and a circular room interpreted as a possible sweating room. The excavators regard its overall function as uncertain. Its installations nevertheless show that bathing facilities existed beyond the best-known mansion, within a neighbourhood whose buildings and uses changed around the time of annexation.

Everyday rooms and household equipment

An early second-century domestic complex on the North Ridge offers a simpler arrangement. A doorway opened onto a corridor, with access to rooms on either side. The larger room contained storage installations and an oven. Roof supports differed between the smaller and larger spaces. Here, cooking and keeping supplies occupied a room integrated into the residential plan.

Pottery served this work. Larger jars held provisions, cooking vessels were heated, and bowls presented food at the table. The delicate painted pottery associated with Petra was one part of a much wider collection of vessels. Broken pots discarded around occupied buildings reveal the use and replacement of household equipment over time.

Ceramic oil lamps provided portable light. Oil held in a small reservoir fed a wick, whose exposed end burned at the opening. Lamps could illuminate an interior or be carried where daylight was insufficient. The same object type also occurs in burials, where it formed part of a different setting. Its use depended on where and how it was placed.

Water and changes over time

Daily life required water to be carried, stored and used for food preparation, drinking and cleaning. At Petra, household needs depended on a wider system that captured rainfall and conveyed spring water. In an oasis such as Hegra, wells and irrigated areas linked residents with a groundwater supply. Collecting and distributing water connected the house to infrastructure beyond its walls.

Buildings did not remain fixed through the Roman centuries. New partitions, blocked doorways and added ovens changed parts of the ez-Zantur mansion, whose occupation ended in the earthquake of 363 CE. The North Ridge complex likewise remained in use until major damage in the fourth century. Later inhabitants adapted earlier spaces to their own needs, leaving a sequence of domestic arrangements across the same ground.