Nabataean Gods, Sanctuaries and Religious Communities

Nabataean religion centred on gods associated with communities, places and families. Dushara held a prominent position across the kingdom, while other deities had particular local followings. Worship took place in monumental temples, open-air sanctuaries and smaller niches cut into rock.

Inscriptions identify divine names and the people who made dedications. Buildings show how sacred spaces were arranged, and carved stones or figures reveal how divine presence could be represented. Together they describe a religious landscape in which kings, families, priests and individual patrons participated.

On this page6 sections

Dushara and the places of his worship

Dushara was a major god of the Nabataeans, named in dedications from Petra, Hegra and other regions. His name is commonly interpreted as referring to the Shara mountain region of southern Jordan, although the precise origin of the title remains debated. Inscriptions also associate him with Gaia, the settlement now represented by Wadi Musa near Petra.

Such place-related titles helped locate divine authority. The god of a particular settlement could protect its community while being recognized farther afield. At Bosra, Dushara was identified with the local deity A’ra, creating the combined form Dushara-A’ra in inscriptions. This connected a widely revered Nabataean god with an established local religious setting.

Dushara also had a relationship with royal representation. Some texts call him the god of the king, and prayers or dedications could be made for members of the royal family. Religion supplied a language through which a patron could express loyalty as well as seek divine protection.

Goddesses and regional communities

Allat and al-Uzza were important divine names, with different patterns of attestation. Allat is particularly visible at Iram in Wadi Rum and in the Hauran of southern Syria. Al-Uzza, whose name can be understood as “the mightiest,” appears in inscriptions at Petra. Scholars debate the relationship between the two and whether some communities understood them as forms of the same goddess.

At Salkhad in the Hauran, inscriptions from 56 and 95 CE record the building and rebuilding of a temple for Allat. They connect the sanctuary with members of a particular family. Maintaining the goddess’s house was therefore a continuing act of local patronage, with successive work recorded in stone.

At Iram, dedications ask Allat to remember named people, including a builder. The words preserve individual connections to the deity and the work being done at her sanctuary. They place workers and patrons within the history of a religious site, alongside more formal references to rulers or officials.

At Hegra, tomb texts invoke Dushara, Hubal and Manotu in protecting burial rights. In Tomb 39’s inscription, divine authority supports the rules established by Kamkam and her daughter Kulaybat. The gods belong within the family’s practical concern for its monument and future burials.

Sacred stones, niches and human figures

A betyl is a sacred stone representing divine presence. It could stand freely or occupy a niche, a recess that gave it a defined setting. Some examples are simple blocks; others include stylized eyes or a nose. Their significance came from their sacred identity and placement.

Petra’s Siq preserves niches associated with this kind of worship along the narrow approach to the city. At Hegra, niches and inscriptions around Jabal Ithlib likewise create a landscape of smaller sacred settings. A dedication could identify the god or person associated with one of these places.

Human images also belonged to Nabataean religious art. The Temple of the Winged Lions at Petra contained carved figures and an eye-shaped object naming the goddess of Hayyan, son of Nybat. Egyptian divine imagery, including objects associated with Isis and Osiris, appears among its finds. Allat and al-Uzza have both been proposed as identities for its principal goddess, but the surviving inscription names her through Hayyan’s relationship with her.

Sacred stones and human forms thus offered different ways of giving a deity a material presence. Their coexistence helped patrons and artists work with local traditions and imagery shared across neighbouring regions.

Sanctuaries and their sacred focus

A sanctuary was an area set apart for a deity and the activities associated with that deity. It might consist of an open-air installation or of a temple within an enclosure. Courts, steps, doorways and raised inner spaces organized movement toward a sacred focus.

At the Temple of the Winged Lions, a porch led into the principal sanctuary room, or cella. A raised central installation and surrounding features distinguished the place of the cult image or sacred objects. Painted plaster, gilding and carved decoration made the interior a carefully prepared setting.

The hilltop sanctuary of Khirbet et-Tannur, north of Petra, combined a courtyard, an inner shrine and dining rooms. Its carvings include foliage, fruit and figures drawing on the religious imagery of the wider region. An inscription dedicates a monument to Qos, the god of Hurawa. The text supplies a divine name where identifying every sculpted figure is more difficult.

Tannur was connected with the nearby settlement and sanctuary of Khirbet edh-Dharih. An inscription from the reign of Aretas IV names an official responsible for the spring of La’ban. The record connects religious patronage with a particular person and the management of a resource important to the surrounding community.

Priests, income and the work of patronage

Inscriptions identify several kinds of religious personnel. Priests of Allat occur at Iram and in the Hauran, while other titles appear at Hegra and in the Sinai. These terms belong to local institutions whose arrangements could differ between sanctuaries.

A damaged inscription from the Temple of the Winged Lions refers to silver, gold, provisions and money, alongside a share assigned to priests. Although parts of its wording remain uncertain, it shows a temple concerned with the handling and allocation of resources. Sacred buildings required continuing support as well as an initial commission.

Patrons could contribute buildings, carved objects or dedications. An inscription recorded the gift and its maker, sometimes adding a prayer for a ruler’s life or for the remembrance of a family. At Salkhad, the same family maintained Allat’s temple over generations. At smaller rock-cut sites, a named individual could establish a sacred setting without commissioning a monumental building.

The god Obodas provides another example of religious association. An inscription at Petra dated to 20 CE records an image dedicated to him, while another near the Deir names a group of his devotees. He is often understood as a deified royal ancestor, but linking him securely with a particular king named Obodas remains unresolved. The dedications establish the cult more clearly than they establish that personal identification.

Religious connections after the monarchy

Nabataean religious communities extended beyond the kingdom’s borders. At Puteoli in Italy, merchants maintained a sanctuary of Dushara in a Roman port district. Its Latin dedications and local building materials placed their worship within the surroundings of an Italian commercial community.

Worship also continued after Roman annexation in 106 CE. At Bosra, coins and inscriptions preserve Dushara’s local identity, and third-century celebrations called the Actia Dousaria honoured him. These belong to Roman provincial life, demonstrating that a deity associated with the former kingdom could remain part of a city’s institutions.

Later changes reshaped the religious landscape. Petra’s Temple of the Winged Lions was destroyed in the earthquake of 363, and a major Christian church was built in the city in the fifth century. Older architectural stone was reused within new buildings. The remains preserve both the durability of sacred traditions and the communities that gave those places different religious purposes over time.