Nabataean Writing and the Development of Arabic Script

The Nabataeans used writing to name rulers on coins, identify the owners of tombs, dedicate offerings and record transactions. Their best-known inscriptions are in Aramaic, written in a distinctive alphabet that developed from the wider Aramaic tradition. Over several centuries, increasingly connected forms of these letters helped give rise to Arabic script.

This history extends beyond the independent kingdom, which Rome annexed in 106 CE. A first-century tomb inscription and a fifth-century desert graffito belong to different political and linguistic settings, even when their letters share a recognizable ancestry. Reading them together reveals a gradual development in handwriting, alongside changes in the languages people chose for particular purposes.

On this page6 sections

An alphabet for consonants

Nabataean writing runs from right to left. Its alphabet has 22 basic letters, chiefly representing consonants. Such a system is often called an abjad. Readers supplied much of a word’s vowel information from their knowledge of the language and the sentence, although some consonant letters could also help indicate vowels.

That arrangement differs from an alphabet in which a separate written vowel is normally required in each syllable. A name or ordinary word could therefore have a compact written form. To understand it, a reader needed more than the sound of each isolated letter: familiar word patterns, names and formulae helped resolve what was meant.

Letter shapes also varied with the material and the writer. An inscription cut into stone required deliberate strokes and could preserve relatively formal shapes. Ink writing on papyrus encouraged quicker movements of the hand. Letters could be linked, abbreviated or shaped differently at the end of a word. Formal and cursive styles overlapped; they did not form two successive systems with a single changeover date.

Languages spoken and languages written

Aramaic was widely used for administration and communication across the ancient Near East. Nabataean Aramaic belonged to this broader language tradition, with its own grammatical features and a vocabulary shaped by local life.

Arabic was also present in Nabataean communities. Arabic personal names occur in Aramaic inscriptions, and Arabic features became increasingly visible in later writing. Recent linguistic research supports the use of both Arabic and Aramaic as spoken languages, alongside Aramaic’s prominent position in formal texts.

A formal tomb text might retain an established Aramaic legal formula, while its owners had Arabic names. A later inscription might combine an Arabic expression with an Aramaic blessing. Such combinations reflect the resources available to writers in a multilingual region.

Tombs, dedications and royal coins

At Hegra, inscriptions make some of the rock-cut tombs unusually personal. Tomb 39 was commissioned by Kamkam and her daughter Kulaybat around 1 BCE–1 CE. Its text identifies the family, dates the monument by the ninth year of King Aretas IV and names the mason Wahballahi, son of Abdobodat.

The inscription also sets out rules for the tomb’s future. It restricts sale, pledging and unauthorized burial, while allowing exceptions through written permission from Kamkam or Kulaybat. Writing thus did several jobs on the same facade: it commemorated the commissioners, placed the work within a royal chronology and stated rights over a valuable family monument. A person approaching the chamber encountered both architecture and a public declaration of ownership.

Religious inscriptions served another purpose. They could identify the person who made a dedication and the divine recipient, preserving a relationship that might otherwise be difficult to recognize from an image alone. The inscribed eye-shaped sacred object from the Temple of the Winged Lions at Petra, for example, names the goddess of Hayyan, son of Nybat. The words narrow the interpretation of the object, even though identifying that goddess with a better-known deity remains a scholarly proposal.

Coins carried much shorter texts. A ruler’s name, royal title and sometimes a year accompanied images of kings and queens. Their repeated circulation carried Nabataean lettering beyond a single building. The compact space encouraged concise formulae, but still allowed the monarchy to identify itself in its own written tradition.

Documents that travelled with their owners

Papyrus documents show writing at work away from monumental facades. The archive preserved by Babatha, a Jewish woman from the Dead Sea region, includes Nabataean Aramaic deeds from before the Roman annexation, alongside later documents in other languages. Its surviving texts date from 94 to 132 CE.

In 99 CE, Babatha’s father Shimon acquired property at Maoza, an oasis on the southern shore of the Dead Sea. Documents from the transaction and earlier dealings were kept as part of the family’s title to its land. A deed could record the parties, the property and the terms in a form that remained useful long after the payment itself.

The archive also contains marriage agreements, loans, property declarations and records of disputes from the Roman period. These were portable texts: families could preserve them, produce them in a dispute and use them to support a claim. Their survival shows why everyday legal writing mattered to people who owned orchards or managed a child’s assets, as well as to royal officials and temple patrons.

How letters became more connected

Connected handwriting changes the shape of a letter because the pen has to enter and leave it. A stroke that looks distinct when written alone may flatten or extend when joined to its neighbours. Over time, frequent shortcuts can become recognizable alternatives to an older form.

The letter y, for example, appears in early Nabataean forms with a loop and an inclined descending stroke. In later examples, the loop can flatten and the letter can acquire connections on both sides. The form of m also varies as writers connect it to preceding or following letters. Older and more developed shapes could appear in the same text.

Dated examples give this process a historical setting. A Sinai inscription from 206 CE largely retains classical Nabataean forms, while an inscription from the northwestern Arabian desert dated to 295 CE uses more developed lettering. A formal inscription at Hegra from 356 CE still preserves older features.

From Nabataean tradition to early Arabic writing

Later inscriptions increasingly combine evolved letter shapes with Arabic language. One desert inscription dated to 455–456 CE names Phaymu, son of Ubaydu, and an official action associated with a king named Amr. Arabic features occur alongside inherited Aramaic expressions. It belongs to a transitional written world, rather than fitting neatly into an entirely Aramaic or entirely Arabic category.

By the sixth century, inscriptions at places including Zebed in northern Syria, Jabal Says southeast of Damascus and Harran in the southern Syrian region provide dated examples of early Arabic writing, from 512, 528 and 568 CE respectively. The developing script had moved through communities and political settings far beyond the lifetime of Nabataean kingship.

Arabic writing developed conventions for distinguishing letters that shared a basic shape. Dots above or below that shape could indicate different consonants: in the later system, b has one dot below, t two above and th three above. Connected letter forms were therefore accompanied by distinctions that made them usable for Arabic’s sounds. These conventions extended a writing tradition whose older forms remain visible on Nabataean tombs and coins.