Travel and Transport in the Ottoman Empire

From the empire’s expansion in the fourteenth century to its end in 1922, a journey might mean walking between villages, taking pack animals over a mountain pass, joining a pilgrimage caravan or boarding a steamer between landing stages on the Bosphorus, the strait separating Istanbul’s European and Asian shores. Merchants, pilgrims, messengers, workers and displaced families travelled for different reasons and faced different arrangements. A route that moved goods for trade also required places to rest, obtain feed and water, and continue the trip.

On this page5 sections

Roads, animals and places to stop

On roads, people walked or rode while pack animals carried people and goods. In western Anatolia, camels carried heavy loads over long distances; horses, donkeys and mules were more useful for shorter trips, riders, messages and urgent deliveries. Pack animals could leave a muddy or snowbound track when a cart could not. In 1604, an Ottoman order directed that rice from Siroz and Drama be carried by horse or mule if rain made cart transport to Istanbul impracticable. For early modern commercial caravans, one study estimates a typical day’s progress at about 30 to 40 kilometres, although terrain and weather could change the pace.

Safranbolu, in northwestern Anatolia, grew as a caravan station on an east–west route. Its caravan trade peaked in the seventeenth century, when the central market expanded to serve travellers as well as local residents. The Cinci inn, built in 1640–48, had sixty guest rooms; the town also had stores, stables and baths. The inn sheltered people while nearby stables provided for animals, and its location put travellers within reach of the market.

For craft workers, travel could mean looking for employment or following an assignment. Historian Suraiya Faroqhi’s archival study describes artisans travelling toward Istanbul in search of better prospects; Ottoman officials also sent craftsmen far from home to repair fortresses. A work journey therefore depended on a destination and a job, unlike a merchant’s trip arranged around buying and selling or a pilgrim’s journey timed to a religious season.

Official horses and private journeys

The state’s courier stations gave authorized messengers access to horses and support that ordinary travellers did not automatically receive. Before a 1539 reorganization under Süleyman I, couriers could requisition animals and provisions from people along the road; abuses led Grand Vizier Lütfi Pasha to establish fixed stations with local attendants responsible for keeping horses ready. The obligation to serve official traffic fell on station communities as well as on the courier.

Later rules specified what a messenger could take and what it cost. A 1697 regulation set the number of horses allowed at each station and payment at ten akçe, Ottoman currency, per hour of use. From 1777, officials and couriers increasingly hired station horses from local operators and paid separately for food and fodder. These arrangements helped official messages move quickly, but they did not give private travellers the same entitlement. People on private journeys arranged their own animals, hired a place in a caravan, or paid for lodging and provisions as they went.

Pilgrimage and the road to Mecca

Pilgrimage required arrival by a religious date, so travellers assembled at major staging points and moved in groups. Damascus became the main gathering place for pilgrims coming from Anatolia, Iraq, Iran and farther east before they continued south toward Medina and Mecca. Ottoman authorities also sent the surre, money and gifts for the people of the holy cities, in a ceremonial caravan with a decorated wooden frame called the mahmil. The surre party joined other pilgrims at Damascus, but its official cargo and ceremonies were distinct from each pilgrim’s personal supplies and costs.

An 1837 route record shows how a long overland journey was organized. The surre caravan left Istanbul from Sirkeci, crossed the Bosphorus to Üsküdar on Istanbul’s Asian shore, and continued by way of İzmit, Akşehir, Konya, Adana, Antakya and Hama to Damascus, then through Maʿan and Medina to Mecca. It stopped at fifty-four stations on the outward trip. The record counts fifty-eight outward travel days and thirty-two return travel days, separate from the thirty-one-day stay in Damascus so its members could observe Ramadan, the Muslim fasting month, and join the larger pilgrimage movement. The ninety travel days therefore exclude the Damascus stop.

An Istanbul pilgrim writing in 1718 described reservoirs and shelters along the route. Reservoirs supplied water, while shelters and route forts gave pilgrims places to stop between long stretches; these facilities formed part of the road’s water and security network.

The road also involved risks. A bandit attack near Payas robbed the 1863 surre caravan, and the lack of security led officials to send later surres by sea to Beirut before continuing overland from Damascus. The change of route shows how danger could alter where a journey began and how its stages were arranged.

Rivers, coasts and migration by sea

Boats served short crossings, river journeys and coastal travel; larger sailing ships connected distant ports. Sailing depended on wind and weather, and passengers needed provisions for days at sea. The journey could be one leg of a longer trip: Istanbul’s surre caravan crossed the Bosphorus by boat from Sirkeci to Üsküdar before continuing overland.

Sea transport also carried people who were migrating under pressure. During the Circassian displacement from the Caucasus, the Black Sea route carried refugees toward Anatolia and the Balkan provinces in 1863–65. Many travelled in sail-powered vessels and suffered from disease and malnutrition in ports and at sea. In the 1877–78 war, refugees also fled from Balkan ports toward the empire’s Asian shore. The Ottoman government chartered steamers; four Austrian Lloyd ships carried about 20,000 Circassians and other fugitives within three weeks. Their route and vessel were shaped by officials and emergency, rather than by passengers choosing a destination as a pilgrim or merchant might.

Steamships, fares and railways

Steam service made some journeys more regular. The Şirket-i Hayriyye, founded to help residents of the Bosphorus reach Istanbul, began service in spring 1852 with four paddle steamers imported from England. Passengers boarded at separate landing stages on the European and Asian shores. The company’s routes changed with population and demand; later it added waiting rooms at important piers, and ticket offices began in 1881.

A fare dispute reveals how paying for a short trip could become difficult. During the monetary crisis of the Russo-Ottoman War of 1877–78, some company workers demanded coin instead of depreciating paper money or accepted the paper below its official value. When staff on a Üsküdar ferry again offered a poor rate, passengers refused to pay and went to the company office to protest. The fare was not only a posted price: the form and accepted value of payment mattered too.

Railways later replaced some stages of older routes. The Hejaz Railway reached Medina in 1908, changing the final approach for pilgrims travelling from the north. The planned extension to Mecca was never built, so pilgrims had to arrange the final leg by road. Elsewhere, people continued to use animals, carts and sailing craft where railway lines and steamship services did not reach.