Byzantine Transport and Travel: Journeys by Land and Sea

Byzantine travellers used roads and pack animals and arranged passage aboard merchant ships. Coastal shipping carried heavier cargoes than overland transport, while river crossings required bridges or ferries. Passengers obtained provisions and lodging along the route; envoys and other authorised officials could use imperial relays. Roman roads and ports continued to serve journeys as their upkeep and political control changed.

Merchants, pilgrims, envoys, soldiers and people visiting relatives did not travel under identical conditions. An official authorised to use relay animals enjoyed advantages unavailable to most private travellers. A merchant had to protect and deliver goods, while a pilgrim might deliberately leave a direct route to visit a shrine. Distance mattered, but so did the traveller’s resources, companions and purpose.

On this page7 sections

Walking, riding and carrying goods

Road travel required choices about speed, carrying capacity and cost. Walking avoided the expense of a riding animal, but it limited what a person could carry and made a long journey physically demanding. Horses and mules could carry riders or loads, while carts served routes on which the surface, gradients and width allowed wheeled traffic. The needs of the animal added another calculation: a traveller had to find fodder and water as well as food and shelter for people.

Travellers could change their method as the terrain changed. In her late-fourth-century account of a journey through the eastern provinces, Egeria describes climbing Sinai on foot because the ascent could not be made in the saddle. Monks received her party and guided it through places associated with biblical events.

Routes also served different scales of movement. A path between a village and its fields or market town had a different role from a military road connecting the capital with a frontier. Local traffic could continue even when a long-distance route lost political importance. Conversely, the need to move an army or maintain official communications could encourage investment in a crossing used by other travellers.

Crossings and the condition of roads

A river could interrupt an otherwise usable overland route. Travellers depended on a bridge, ferry, ford or temporary crossing, and the safest choice could change with the water level. A flood might delay a journey or force a longer detour. For people moving goods, changing from animals or carts to boats also meant unloading, arranging passage and loading again on the other bank.

Justinian completed the Sangarius Bridge in 562 to replace a flood-prone pontoon crossing on the road towards the eastern provinces. The river later changed course, leaving a smaller watercourse beside the surviving structure.

Road upkeep affected journey times. Mud, damaged paving and mountain weather could delay movement. Military traffic helped sustain important Anatolian routes, while local authorities and communities maintained facilities along them.

Official transport and private arrangements

The dromos, the Byzantine imperial relay service, supplied authorised travellers with animals and accommodation. Official permission controlled access because local communities bore obligations to support the facilities.

Private travellers generally had to make their own arrangements. Those sending a letter might entrust it to a servant, acquaintance or someone already making the journey. Transport could therefore depend on personal connections as well as money. The operation of the official relays and their changing administration are explained in Byzantine roads and communication.

Ships, cargoes and coastal journeys

The Mediterranean, Aegean and Black Sea connected coastal towns and islands that could be awkward to reach overland. Ships could move quantities of goods that would require many pack animals or carts. Grain, wine and other supplies helped sustain maritime routes, while passengers and officials also depended on available shipping. A journey by water could therefore follow the opportunities of trade rather than a traveller’s preferred timetable.

Embarkation required finding a suitable vessel and making arrangements for passage. Departure depended on the ship’s work, its loading and the conditions at sea. Wind could make one leg of a voyage relatively easy and another slow or dangerous. Harbours and sheltered anchorages mattered because crews needed places to wait, take on supplies and protect their vessels.

The early-eleventh-century wreck at Serçe Limanı provides an archaeological example of these connections and risks. The ship carried goods from the Fatimid eastern Mediterranean along southern Anatolia, but sank after entering a harbour for shelter and being driven onto rocks. Its cargo included glass intended for recycling.

Ferries and navigable river stretches connected parts of overland routes. Boat use depended on current, depth and suitable landings. Changing between land and water could allow a journey to continue across different terrain.

Food, accommodation and hospitality

Travel required repeated spending and preparation. A traveller needed provisions for the next stage and a way to replace them. Food that could be carried and stored reduced dependence on finding a cooked meal at a particular time. Dry bread and preserved foods belonged to the same practical world of provisioning described in Byzantine food and drink.

Monastic rules assigned responsibilities for receiving visitors and supplying meals. Egeria describes lodging and eating with monks during her pilgrimage, recording assistance provided by religious communities.

Travelling together could provide help with unfamiliar routes and emergencies. Companions might share information or assist with animals and baggage. Yet a group also needed more food and accommodation. Wealth made it possible to employ assistance and absorb delays; a person with few resources had less freedom to change plans.

Paying for shelter and waiting for passage

Commercial lodging existed alongside religious hospitality. Inns and taverns could supply shelter, food or drink to travellers who paid for them. Late antique evidence from Korykos on the Cilician coast identifies innkeeping among urban occupations, including a man who combined it with work as a gravedigger.

Travellers might pay separately for accommodation, animal fodder and onward provisions. Waiting increased the cost of food and shelter. Acquaintances and religious hosts could supply assistance alongside commercial lodging.

Sea passage created similar demands. In a late-fourth-century letter, Synesius describes a troubled journey from Alexandria toward Cyrenaica. The passengers had brought too little food for an unexpectedly prolonged voyage. After landing, they obtained assistance and provisions from people nearby before continuing.

Wind, the condition of a vessel and the availability of supplies shaped departure and onward movement. A merchant ship’s route and business could require stops that did not suit a passenger’s intentions. Travellers consequently needed some margin for waiting, while those with few resources could have difficulty buying food or arranging an alternative.

Pilgrimage and changing political frontiers

Pilgrims travelled to places associated with Christ, biblical events, saints and relics. Some journeys crossed long distances, while others connected nearby communities with a regional shrine. Jerusalem and Sinai drew visitors from beyond the empire, and religious travel continued even when those places were no longer under Byzantine rule.

Travel accounts also show that visiting was an organised activity. Local guides identified holy places, explained traditions and helped visitors move through them. Egeria combined movement with readings and prayer appropriate to each location.

War, raiding and changes in territorial control could alter access to a route without ending movement altogether. Travellers might use another port, seek assistance or postpone departure. The risks and possibilities differed between the late antique empire, the smaller medieval state and the fragmented territories after 1204. Routes could remain important to merchants and pilgrims long after the government that had maintained them lost control of the region.