Mathura Art under the Kushans

Mathura’s red sandstone workshops produced some of the most distinctive images of the Kushan period. In the first to third centuries CE, the city in northern India supplied Buddhist, Jain and Brahmanical communities with sacred figures and carved furnishings. Royal statues also gave Kushan authority a monumental form. The makers worked within a local tradition of large, full-bodied figures while developing ways to identify different teachers, deities and rulers.

The stone itself helped give these works their character. Mottled red sandstone from the surrounding region, including the Sikri quarries, could carry a broad chest, a smooth robe or a densely decorated railing post. Inscriptions then added another kind of information: the name of a donor, the place of a gift or a date within the Kushan era. Image and text together made a dedication both visible and memorable.

On this page7 sections

Stone carving and an inherited local tradition

Mathura’s sculptural history began before Kushan rule. Earlier images of yakshas, powerful spirits associated with places, nature and prosperity, established a tradition of substantial standing bodies. Jain teachers and other ascetic figures also contributed to the forms through which sacred persons were represented. Kushan-period makers drew on this inheritance while adapting figures to different religious identities.

Carving required the planned removal of material from a stone block. Broad body forms, faces and garments had to remain connected with a support, whether a back slab, a pedestal or the surrounding architecture. A sculptor could work a figure largely free from its background or present it as a relief projecting from a surface. These choices affected its weight, strength and the directions from which it could be seen.

Many Mathuran sacred figures have broad shoulders, a substantial chest, rounded cheeks and a composed or smiling mouth. A thin garment may closely follow the body rather than become the dominant surface of the image. These features give the figures an immediate physical presence, while an inscription, symbol or attribute identifies whom the body represents.

Buddhist figures and their sacred identities

Mathura became an important centre for early human images of the Buddha. Some earlier Buddhist art had indicated his presence through an empty seat, footprints, a sacred tree or a wheel. Anthropomorphic images, representations in human form, gave the teacher a visible body that could occupy a shrine or stand within a sacred precinct. The earliest history of this development remains a subject of research, but dated Kushan-era dedications establish that substantial images were being installed by the beginning of Kanishka’s reign.

Early Mathuran figures often have a smooth head with a coiled or knob-like arrangement of hair, a halo and a robe that follows the body’s shape. A raised hand can express reassurance: the gesture commonly called abhaya holds the open palm towards the viewer. These features turn pose and dress into a religious language. The body is upright and composed, the hand addresses the worshipper, and the halo distinguishes the sacred person from surrounding figures.

Some inscriptions call their figure a bodhisattva, a being on the path to awakening. This terminology belongs to the dedication’s religious setting and helps identify how a patron or community described the work. Later and contemporary images could give bodhisattvas princely adornment, including jewellery and elaborate hair, while a Buddha’s monastic robe emphasized renunciation. Maitreya, the future Buddha, was an important subject for such images.

The differences between Mathura and Gandhara are especially visible in clothing and body form. Gandharan sculptors commonly made deep folds conspicuous across a robe. Mathuran makers often emphasized the large chest and shoulders beneath a lighter garment. Contact between the regions allowed visual forms to circulate, but Mathura retained a recognizable approach to the sacred body.

Donors, inscriptions and images that travelled

The monk Bala’s standing image at Sarnath provides a concrete example of a Mathuran work installed elsewhere. Made of red sandstone, it was erected in year three of the Kanishka era at the place Buddhist tradition associated with the Buddha’s first teaching. A large stone umbrella accompanied the figure. Producing and installing this monument required the coordination of its carved parts and their movement from the workshop to the sacred destination.

Bala was described as learned in the Tripitaka, the three collections of Buddhist teaching. The nun Buddhamitra was connected with the dedication, and the names of the governors Vanaspara and Kharapallana also appeared. Such records link sculpture with teachers, officials and organized support. A sacred image could thus embody an undertaking shared by several participants.

Mathura’s inscriptions also record female teachers and family gifts. A year-thirty-one dedication names Khuda and another donor as pupils of the nun Dinna. In year thirty-nine, the nun Budhadeva, identified as Pushahathini’s pupil, established an image together with her parents. These records preserve relationships of instruction as well as donation. Their formulas could dedicate the religious benefit to parents or to all living beings, making the image a means of sharing merit.

Jain teachers and votive plaques

Jain patrons formed another important part of Mathura’s artistic community. Their images represented Jinas or Tirthankaras, revered teachers who had attained liberation from the cycle of rebirth. Standing or seated in meditation, the figures convey stillness and renunciation. In many Kushan-period works they are nude, expressing the abandonment of possessions rather than the princely appearance of an adorned bodhisattva.

A small auspicious mark called the srivatsa could appear on a teacher’s chest. Other sculptures combined four Tirthankaras facing different directions. Such a form gave viewers approaching from several sides a sacred figure to confront, joining the arrangement of bodies with the movement of people around the object.

Ayagapatas were stone votive plaques, surfaces dedicated for religious worship. They carried auspicious symbols, sacred architectural forms or images of teachers. The tradition began before Kushan rule and remained important in the early centuries CE. A carved plaque offered a compact focus for devotion, while its inscription could identify the person or household that had given it.

These works supplied Jain communities with a distinct repertoire within the same regional stone-carving tradition. The shared material and workshop environment did not erase the differences between a motionless Jain teacher, a Buddhist figure in a robe and an armed or many-armed deity.

Giving Brahmanical deities a recognizable form

Mathura also contributed to the development of images used in Brahmanical worship. Some deities had appeared earlier in Buddhist narrative settings, where Brahma and Indra could attend the Buddha. Kushan-period workshops increasingly made images whose principal subject was a deity worshipped in its own right.

Shiva, Vishnu and Skanda-Karttikeya, a deity associated with war, were among these subjects. Multiple arms allowed a figure to carry several attributes, objects that conveyed its powers or associations. A trident helped identify Shiva; a wheel, mace and conch belonged to forms associated with Vishnu. By combining body, hairstyle and attributes, a maker gave a deity a form that worshippers could recognize.

Vasudeva, associated with Krishna and the development of Vishnu worship, was a particularly important figure in the Mathura region. The Kushan king Vasudeva I shared this divine name. In sculpture, the deity’s attributes identify a sacred figure; in dated records, the king’s name identifies the human ruler under whom a dedication took place.

This visual language was still developing. Some early images combine attributes that later became more firmly associated with separate deities. The combinations show makers formulating a sacred identity through recognizable objects, drawing on a body language already used in the city’s other religious sculpture.

Royal statues at Mat

At Mat near Mathura, a royal foundation identified in an inscription as a devakula, a house of deities, contained portraits associated with Vima Taktu, Huvishka and Kanishka. The statues placed dynastic representation within a sacred building. Its precise cult is debated, but the royal character of the foundation is clear.

Kanishka’s standing statue presents a particularly forceful appearance. He wears a substantial coat and riding boots, holds weapons and faces forward. The clothing recalls the dynasty’s Central Asian background, while the scale and stance give the ruler a commanding presence. An inscription in Brahmi, a script used in northern India, supplies royal titles, connecting the image with an explicit statement of authority.

This differed from the purpose of a donor’s religious inscription. A dedication identified participants in a gift and its intended benefit; a royal portrait and title proclaimed the standing of the dynasty. Both nevertheless used the same durable medium to give a relationship between people, power and sacred space a public form.

Carved settings and later developments

Mathuran art extended beyond isolated statues. Railing posts and architectural brackets carried figures, foliage and scenes. Women associated with trees, often described as yakshis, brought themes of fertility and abundance into the decorated setting. A railing organized the boundary of a sacred area while giving sculptors a surface on which to place such imagery.

Works from Mathura also travelled beyond the immediate region. Red sandstone railing fragments at Sanghol in the Punjab display the Mathuran tradition in a distant Buddhist establishment. Like Bala’s image at Sarnath, they show that the reach of a workshop could exceed the city where its makers worked.

Mathura continued producing sculpture after the main period of Kushan rule. Gupta-period artists in the fourth to sixth centuries developed new treatments of the Buddha’s body, face and robe. Those later images drew on forms established in earlier centuries while changing their proportions and expression. The Kushan period had already made Mathura a major centre in which a shared material and sculptural skill served several religious communities and the dynasty itself.