History of the Knights Hospitaller: From Jerusalem to Malta

The Knights Hospitaller grew from a community caring for sick and poor pilgrims in Jerusalem into a religious order that combined charitable work with military duties. Papal recognition in 1113 gave the hospital an independent institutional standing; over the following centuries, its members defended the Christian states in the eastern Mediterranean, built a network of European properties and governed first Rhodes and then Malta. The order lost its territorial rule in 1798, but several distinct modern organizations later carried forward aspects of its religious, charitable and chivalric traditions.

“Knights Hospitaller” is a familiar name for an institution whose members were originally called brothers. Its identity also changed over time: the medieval order based in Jerusalem was not the same organization in every respect as the later bodies that adopted the name and traditions of St John.

On this page6 sections

From a Jerusalem hospital to a recognized order

The order’s roots lay in a Benedictine community in Jerusalem established with support from merchants of Amalfi. By the late eleventh century, the community had a hospital associated with St John, where sick and poor Christian pilgrims could receive care. Gerard, a lay brother who headed the hospital, helped it develop into an institution with a life of its own.

On 15 February 1113, Pope Paschal II issued the bull Pie postulatio voluntatis. It placed the hospital under papal protection and recognized its independence from the Benedictine community. The brothers gained the right to elect their own superior, and the hospital received exemptions that helped it manage its lands and revenues. This recognition is an important marker in the order’s history, though its organization continued to develop afterward.

Under Gerard’s successor, Raymond du Puy, the brothers adopted a religious rule and expanded their administrative structure. Their commitments included prayer, communal religious life and service to the sick. The hospital’s work remained central even as the order acquired new responsibilities. Its members relied on donations and estates, including properties in Europe, to sustain their work in the eastern Mediterranean. Local houses and larger administrative units helped collect and direct those resources.

How care and military service came together

The military role emerged gradually rather than defining the institution from its beginning. The order first cared for pilgrims and other people in need; as insecurity increased, it also arranged armed protection for travellers. By the twelfth century, it was employing fighters and developing a body of brothers who could serve in battle. Later rules and statutes formally distinguished armed brothers from priest brothers and brothers responsible for other services.

The order’s resources supported both its hospital and its defences. European properties supplied income, while donations and gifts of land helped it acquire fortresses and maintain forces in the eastern Mediterranean. In turn, the order’s military responsibilities made it a participant in the politics and warfare of the states where it operated. Its members guarded routes, defended strongholds and took part in campaigns, while continuing to present the care of the sick as a defining duty.

Leadership was held by a superior elected by the brothers; the title of grand master became established later. Officers oversaw practical functions such as military affairs, finances, provisions and hospital care. This combination of religious leadership, administrative offices and regional resources allowed the order to operate across a wide area, rather than relying solely on its headquarters.

The Hospitallers in Jerusalem and the Holy Land

After the First Crusade captured Jerusalem in 1099, the hospital gained prominence in the new Christian-ruled Kingdom of Jerusalem. The order continued its charitable work while becoming more involved in the defence of the kingdom and the protection of pilgrims. Its military duties developed alongside, not instead of, its hospital mission.

In the twelfth century, rulers and nobles entrusted the Hospitallers with castles and other defensive responsibilities. Strongholds helped protect territory and routes, and maintaining them required manpower, supplies and continuing revenue. The order’s responsibilities extended beyond Jerusalem to other parts of the Latin-ruled territories. The Krak des Chevaliers, which the Hospitallers received from the count of Tripoli in the 1140s, illustrates the scale of the defensive role they had acquired.

As Muslim forces reconquered territory, the order’s position shifted toward the coast. Saladin took Jerusalem in 1187. Following Acre’s recovery in 1191, the Hospitallers made their headquarters there. When Acre fell in 1291, the remaining Latin forces left the mainland. The loss of their headquarters in the Holy Land forced the order to seek a new base and adapt its plans.

Cyprus and Rhodes: rebuilding power at sea

After 1291, the Hospitallers moved to Cyprus, where their presence brought them into the kingdom’s political life. Cyprus offered a temporary refuge but not the independent base the order sought. Its leaders turned their attention to Rhodes, then under Byzantine rule, and began a campaign to take the island. Rhodes surrendered to them in 1310 and became the order’s headquarters.

On Rhodes, the Hospitallers developed into a maritime power. Their ships supported the defence of the island and operations across the eastern Mediterranean. Control of Rhodes also gave them a territorial base from which to govern and collect revenue. In 1312, following the suppression of the Knights Templar, Pope Clement V transferred much of the Templars’ property to the Hospitallers. The resulting European estates strengthened the order’s ability to support its island government and military commitments.

The order’s rule on Rhodes was not secure indefinitely. It repelled attacks in the fifteenth century, including a major Ottoman siege in 1480, but in 1522 Sultan Suleiman’s forces besieged the island. The Hospitallers surrendered and were permitted to leave. Their departure ended their rule at Rhodes, but not the institution: after years without a permanent home, they accepted a new base from Charles V.

Malta, 1530 to 1798: rule and maritime warfare

In 1530, Charles V granted Malta and Gozo to the order as a fief, a territory held under an obligation to a higher ruler. The Hospitallers were to send an annual falcon to the king’s representative, the viceroy of Sicily. The grant gave them a lasting base in the central Mediterranean, but it did not make Malta an entirely independent possession. The nearby North African port of Tripoli was also assigned to the order, but the Ottomans captured it in 1551.

The Ottoman siege of Malta in 1565 tested the order’s new position. Hospitaller knights fought alongside Maltese militia and other troops, defending fortified positions until reinforcements from Sicily arrived. The Ottoman force withdrew in September. The defence strengthened the order’s reputation and prompted further fortification. The Hospitallers began building Valletta as a fortified city and new base for their government and fleet.

On Malta, the order maintained hospitals and developed medical institutions alongside its military and administrative work. But its maritime activities also changed. With its territorial base far from the Holy Land, the order increasingly used its fleet to intercept enemy shipping in the corso, officially authorised maritime raiding. Captured cargoes could provide income, and captives could be held for ransom or enslaved. The system involved violence and enslavement on both sides of Mediterranean conflict, including the use of enslaved people as galley rowers. The order’s naval operations therefore served both strategic and economic purposes, and could create disputes with other states over seizures at sea.

The order’s wider European network also came under pressure during the Reformation. Protestant rulers confiscated some of its properties, including its English holdings under Henry VIII in 1540. In the German lands, the Bailiwick of Brandenburg became Protestant while preserving a separate tradition associated with St John. These changes weakened the medieval order’s connections and resources even as it continued to rule Malta.

The loss of Malta and the development of modern Orders of St John

French revolutionary authorities seized Hospitaller property in France, and in 1798 Napoleon’s forces invaded Malta. The order surrendered the island, ending its territorial rule there. Grand Master Ferdinand von Hompesch left Malta and resigned in 1799. The order was left dispersed and without its former base.

Many displaced knights found refuge in Russia, where Tsar Paul I was elected grand master in 1798. His election was not recognized by the pope, in part because Paul was Orthodox rather than Roman Catholic. After his death, the Catholic order’s leadership and future remained unsettled. In 1834, the surviving Roman Catholic organization established itself in Rome, where hospital and welfare work again became a central focus. It is now known as the Sovereign Military Order of Malta.

Other modern Orders of St John developed through different histories. The Protestant Bailiwick of Brandenburg preserved a branch of the order’s tradition after the Reformation; related organizations in the Netherlands and Sweden later became independent. In England, where the medieval order’s property had been confiscated, a British organization took shape in 1831 and received a royal charter in 1888 as the Most Venerable Order of St John. It became associated with services including St John Ambulance and the St John Eye Hospital in Jerusalem.

The Sovereign Military Order of Malta and four Protestant orders, including the Most Venerable Order and the orders of Brandenburg, the Netherlands and Sweden, are commonly identified as modern organizations linked to the Hospitaller inheritance. They remain separate institutions, with different religious affiliations and histories; each has its own membership and governing bodies. Their varied paths show how the Hospitallers’ legacy outlasted their rule of territory, while taking new forms centered largely on charitable and medical service.