Everyday Religion

Religious life in Rus changed between the ninth and thirteenth centuries as Christianity spread through towns and countryside. Across lands now mainly in Ukraine, Belarus and Russia, people encountered the new faith through baptism, church worship, monasteries and Christian objects. Older deities and offerings remained important to some communities, bringing local practices into conflict with clergy.

On this page5 sections

Christianity before and after Vladimir’s conversion

Christian communities existed in Kyiv before the late tenth-century conversion associated with Prince Vladimir. A Rus-Byzantine treaty recorded under 944 in the Primary Chronicle distinguishes Christians, who swore by their faith, from non-Christians, who swore by the gods Perun and Veles. Christians were present among the prince’s following and the merchant community, while the ruling prince remained pagan. These oaths show that different religious commitments could operate within the same political society.

The Primary Chronicle, compiled in the early twelfth century, describes Vladimir setting up images of gods at Kyiv in 980, including Perun and Mokosh. Perun, associated with thunder and princely warfare, also appears in treaty oaths. In the account of conversion traditionally dated to 988, Vladimir orders idols destroyed and the people baptised in a river. Baptism, performed with water and prayer, marked entry into the Christian community.

Church worship and monastic devotion

Churches brought people together for prayers, readings and chanting. The Eucharist, the central service involving consecrated bread and wine, connected communal worship to Christian teaching about Christ. Small crosses and sacred images also carried religious symbols beyond the church building, appearing on the body and among household possessions.

Monasteries offered a more concentrated form of religious life. The Kyiv Monastery of the Caves, established in the eleventh century, became a community of monks whose lives were associated with prayer, discipline, work, and shared observance. The Kyiv Caves Patericon, based on correspondence from the 1220s between Bishop Simon and the monk Polycarp, preserves stories about the monastery’s monks. Simon rebukes Polycarp for seeking ecclesiastical advancement and presents commitment to the monastic community as a better path. The stories describe ideals and disputes as well as remembered monastic life; their accounts of visions and miracles are hagiography, or writing that presents the lives of holy people as religious examples, not straightforward records of routine events.

The Patericon also gives a glimpse of the work that sustained religious communities. Its stories include a monk who baked prosphora, bread prepared for the Eucharist, and an icon painter. Other accounts portray monks caring for the sick, practising severe self-discipline, or giving up wealth. Baking bread, painting icons and caring for sick monks made religious service part of daily work.

Households, offerings, and older rites

Church teachings condemned offerings to Rod and the Rozhanitsy, figures associated in those texts with birth and generation. Offerings included bread, porridge, cheese and mead. Giving food to such powers linked hopes for fertility and family well-being to household resources, and brought the practice under clerical criticism.

Public worship could also involve the prince. The Chronicle’s account of Vladimir’s pantheon places images of the gods at a political centre, while treaty oaths invoke divine punishment on anyone who breaks an agreement. Religious commitments thus shaped both offerings within communities and promises made by rulers and warriors.

Seasonal observance and religious change

Christian observance organised the year around feasts and fasting. Easter celebrated Christ’s resurrection and followed the preparation of Lent; Christmas commemorated his birth. Seasonal agricultural work continued alongside this calendar. Clergy opposed rites directed towards older powers, while local communities could retain practices inherited within families.

The expression “double faith” is sometimes used for the coexistence of Christian and older observances. It describes a process in which people could attend Christian worship and also make offerings condemned by clergy. The particular combination differed between communities and changed as churches and monasteries became established.

Burial and remembrance of the dead

Burial customs gradually shifted from cremation and furnished mound graves towards burial of the body beside churches. Some communities already buried their dead without cremation before conversion, and mound burial continued after Christian rulers came to power. Grave location and treatment therefore changed over generations as families adopted Christian forms of remembrance.

Clearer changes appear in some cities during the eleventh century, when new burial grounds developed beside churches in Kyiv and Chernihiv. At the same time, burial mounds remained in use in parts of the Rus lands, including around Pereyaslavl into the early twelfth century and in areas such as Suzdal and Izborsk during the eleventh and twelfth centuries. These differences show that Christian burial practices spread at different rates rather than replacing older customs everywhere at once.

Remembering the dead also formed part of religious life. Simon’s account of the Kyiv monastery draws on his own experience, stories from other monks, chronicles, and lists of the deceased. The Kyiv Caves Patericon, assembled from the correspondence of Simon and Polycarp, set out to preserve accounts of the monks and the miracles attributed to them. Its stories gave the community models of piety and kept the memory of particular monks alive. Together with changing burial customs, this monastic record shows how Christian remembrance developed within a society whose religious practices remained diverse.

For the wider setting, see Kievan Rus daily life.