Slavery and Dependency in the Abbasid World

Slavery and other forms of dependency connected labour and household life with commerce, warfare and political power in the Abbasid centuries. The useful distinctions lie in acquisition, legal status and the particular work demanded of a person.

A soldier, domestic worker, agricultural labourer and trained performer could face different conditions while all remaining subject to coercive relationships.

On this page6 sections

Acquisition, sale and the making of dependency

Captivity and trafficking supplied people to slave markets, including movement across the caliphate’s frontiers. People entered slavery through several routes, and acquisition was followed by processes that placed them within new households, workplaces or military organisations. Sale transferred control from one owner to another and made dependency part of a commercial relationship. Prices could reflect a person’s age, sex, health, training, appearance or specialised ability. Once acquired, a person might be retained, resold, assigned to another duty or incorporated into the owner’s wider household.

Sale and service also separated the legal status of dependency from the practical experience of particular work. A person employed in domestic labour could have regular contact with the owner’s family, while someone working in agriculture might be managed through a larger labour regime. Military dependants were connected to structures of command and patronage rather than simply to household chores.

Military recruitment and service

Military recruitment formed one important setting for dependency in the Abbasid world. Al-Mu‘tasim’s recruitment of Turkish troops in the ninth century, followed by the development of Samarra from 836, provides a dated example. Enslaved or dependent men could be acquired, trained and placed within military households or units. Their value to rulers and commanders lay not only in physical labour but also in disciplined service and the possibility of creating personal ties to a patron. Military service therefore linked dependency with political power, advancement and access to resources.

Military recruitment involved loss of freedom and a hierarchy of command, while a military dependant could also gain skills, authority and patronage ties unavailable in other forms of service.

Domestic dependency and household work

Domestic dependants worked within households and could perform cooking, cleaning, childcare, personal service and other tasks. Their work took place in a setting where labour, residence and personal relationships overlapped. A household might contain people with different statuses, and the daily organisation of work depended on the size and wealth of the household, the tasks required and the authority exercised by its head.

Domestic service could bring a dependant into close contact with free members of the household, but proximity did not remove unequal status. It could instead make supervision, intimacy and vulnerability part of everyday life. Some dependants acquired specialised skills or formed relationships that altered their circumstances, while others remained assigned to routine labour. The authority of owners continued to shape dependants’ work and personal circumstances.

Agricultural labour and provincial settings

Agricultural dependency operated differently from service in elite households or military organisations. Work was tied to land, irrigation, harvests and the organisation of rural production. In Abbasid Iraq and connected provinces, the conditions of labour could vary according to local ecology, the scale of an estate or enterprise, and the authority of landholders and officials.

The Zanj revolt of 869–883 involved enslaved labourers and other participants in southern Iraq. Some of the labour associated with the revolt involved reclaiming saline land. Agricultural workers contributed to production through physically demanding seasonal and routine tasks. Their labour supported the resources on which households, landholders and governments depended, but the benefits of that production were distributed unequally. Free labour, tenancy and coerced service could exist alongside one another.

Performing slave women and concubinage

Women held in slavery could be used for domestic service, sexual access and performance, and these functions sometimes overlapped. Performing slave women were trained for particular skills and could be valued for music, singing, poetry, conversation or other forms of cultivated entertainment. Their training made them specialised dependants, while their presence in elite and urban households connected slavery with cultural production as well as with domestic labour.

Concubinage was a distinct setting within the wider institution of slavery. It involved a sexual relationship between an enslaved woman and a male owner and was treated differently from marriage in the social and legal arrangements of the period. The relationship could affect a woman’s position within a household, particularly where children or recognition by the owner were involved, but it remained shaped by the initial condition of enslavement. Acknowledged paternity could establish the status known as umm walad, “mother of the owner’s acknowledged child,” and affect the mother’s and child’s legal position. Jurists debated the details; sexual access to an enslaved woman remained distinct from a marriage contract.

The qiyan were enslaved women trained in singing and other cultivated skills. Tenth-century literary accounts, including al-Tanukhi’s stories, portray their performances and household relationships. These narratives reveal the values and tensions authors explored rather than supplying a representative record of all performers. The careers of performing women and the household relationships of concubines can reveal forms of agency without disguising coercion. Skill, reputation, personal ties and the ability to influence patrons could affect a woman’s circumstances. Such opportunities were uneven and depended on the household and historical moment. They did not cancel the power held by owners or turn specialised service into a freely chosen profession.

Manumission and changing status

Manumission was the release of an enslaved person from slavery. It could occur through an owner’s decision, a legal arrangement or a provision connected with death and inheritance. Release changed a person’s formal status, but it did not necessarily erase earlier relationships. Former slaves could remain connected to the household that had owned them through dependence, patronage, employment or family ties.

A person’s legal position could change over time, and release did not guarantee equal wealth, influence or social standing. The relationship of patronage known as wala could retain ties after manumission. A freed person’s wealth, support and obligations depended on their circumstances and continuing ties.