Indo-Greek Cities, Coinage and Networks of Exchange

From the second century BCE into the early first century CE, Indo-Greek rulers governed parts of the northwestern Indian subcontinent, including areas of present-day Pakistan, northwestern India and eastern Afghanistan. The term describes a changing group of kingdoms rather than one state with a single capital throughout. Urban centres such as Taxila and Sagala served different rulers at different times, while coins and archaeological finds trace connections between local communities and wider routes across Central and South Asia.

These cities and markets belonged to a region with a long history of settlement and exchange. Taxila had been an urban centre well before Indo-Greek rule. Sirkap was a new city established across the river in the second century BCE, following earlier phases of settlement at Taxila. Coins, buildings and objects from the period offer evidence of economic life, but the archaeological record is uneven, especially for the earliest phases of Sirkap.

On this page5 sections

Regional capitals and the planned city of Sirkap

Taxila’s position on routes between the subcontinent and Central Asia helped make it a centre of political and commercial activity. The Indo-Greek capital known as Sirkap lay across the river from the older settlement. Taxila’s previous urban history matters here: Sirkap represents a new phase, not a continuation of every earlier neighbourhood or institution. Other centres associated with Indo-Greek rulers included Sagala, Pushkalavati and Bagram. Their prominence reflects a political landscape in which different kings ruled from regional bases, rather than from one enduring capital.

Sirkap’s regular plan organised a main avenue and crossing streets into blocks. Such an arrangement established routes through the city and boundaries between built areas. Its later visible houses and monuments developed over successive occupations, so the plan and surviving masonry need to be considered as stages in the settlement’s history.

Sirkap was founded in the second century BCE and is conventionally associated with Indo-Greek expansion. The exact founding king is uncertain. Indo-Scythian and Indo-Parthian rebuilding later altered the city, including reconstruction after an earthquake around 30 CE. Those later walls and monuments explain the town’s continuing development rather than furnishing a complete intact plan of an Indo-Greek capital.

Royal coins and different monetary standards

Coins provide some of the clearest evidence for Indo-Greek political authority and regional economic connections. Kings issued coins bearing their names, portraits, titles and distinctive images. These features identified the issuing ruler, while the many surviving coin types help establish the sequence of kings and changing political control. A coin’s design could draw on Greek traditions and still make use of local languages, scripts and forms.

Royal issues used different weight standards. A silver drachma of Apollodotus I in the Ashmolean collection weighs 2.46 grams and follows the Indian standard. The term drachma identifies a denomination, while the standard determines its expected weight within a particular system. A familiar Greek denomination name therefore need not imply the weight used in Mediterranean markets.

Silver and copper issues served different scales of value. An issuing authority needed suitable metal and a controlled sequence of manufacture: prepare blanks, engrave dies, strike the designs and check the product. Repeating the image and weight made successive pieces recognisable as members of the same issue.

Greek and Indian languages on the coins

Bilingual legends made royal coinage legible across linguistic settings. Many Indo-Greek coins carried Greek writing on one side and a Prakrit language on the other, commonly written in Kharosthi. Some early bilingual issues used Brahmi instead. Most Indo-Greek kings after Apollodotus I issued coins with Greek and Kharosthi legends, although Greek-only coins were also produced. The combination joined a familiar Greek form of royal representation to language and writing used in the region.

On Apollodotus’s elephant-and-bull issue, Greek Soter and Prakrit tratarasa express the claim that the king was a saviour. The name and title are repeated in different scripts, identifying the same authority for readers using different written traditions. The animals supplied an image recognisable even without reading the legend.

Exchange across regional and long-distance routes

Taxila’s location connected routes leading toward the Indus and Central Asia. Trade in the region was not created by Indo-Greek rule: archaeological evidence shows that Taxila had links with Pushkalavati centuries earlier. Under Indo-Greek kings, coins and urban centres formed part of these existing regional connections. Coins following Indian standards, alongside Greek-standard issues, show that rulers and users operated within monetary practices that crossed cultural and political boundaries.

A report by the Chinese envoy Zhang Qian offers a glimpse of longer-distance exchange around 126 BCE. While in Bactria, he saw bamboo canes and cloth from the Chinese regions of Qiong and Shu. He was told that merchants had acquired these goods in markets in Shendu, a name commonly associated with northwestern India. This account indicates that goods could pass through several markets between southern China, northwestern India and Bactria.

Coins could travel beyond the district in which they were issued through trade, soldiers’ pay, tribute or the movement of savings. A hoard at Qunduz north of the Hindu Kush contained Indo-Greek issues on the Attic standard. The deposit shows that recognised royal money could be gathered and retained far from a king’s principal southern centres.

Producing coins and crafted objects

Minting required several forms of specialist work. A die-cutter engraved the design in reverse so that the blow would produce a raised image on the coin. Metalworkers prepared blanks, and striking brought the two faces together. Changing names, scripts or emblems required changes to the dies, connecting technical production with royal choices.

Finds from Sirkap include coins of Greek-Bactrian kings and stone palettes carved with Greek mythological scenes. Some objects retain Hellenistic styles, while others combine them with local details, such as Indian ornaments on figures from Greek myths. These finds document cultural contact and the circulation of objects and designs. Since the early levels have been only partly excavated, evidence for Indo-Greek urban life is less complete than the extensive remains of later periods might suggest.

For the wider setting, see Indo-Greek Kingdoms: History, Government and Communities.