Warfare

Warfare among the Pontic Scythians, the Iranian-speaking peoples who dominated the northern Black Sea steppe from the 7th to the 3rd century BCE, depended heavily on horses and mobile archery. Their military practices developed through contact with neighbouring societies as well as through the demands of steppe campaigning. Scythian power also shifted over time: groups operating in West Asia in the 7th century BCE did not fight in exactly the same circumstances as the kingdom based later in the Pontic steppe.

This account focuses on the Pontic Scythians of the northern Black Sea steppe. Related eastern communities supplied distinct forms of equipment, while Scythian warriors also served in armies beyond their homeland.

On this page4 sections

Mounted archery and its equipment

The bow was the central weapon of Scythian mounted warfare. Scythian bows were compact, recurved composite bows, made by joining materials such as wood, horn and sinew with glue. Their construction required skilled, time-consuming work. Arrows commonly had reed or birch shafts and bronze heads; iron and bone heads are also recorded. The combination gave a mounted archer a weapon that could be carried and used on horseback.

A bow and arrows were carried together in a gorytos, a case combining a bow holder with a quiver. Worn at the left hip, it kept the archer’s main weapons together and accessible. Some examples were practical leather cases, while elite versions could be decorated with precious-metal plaques. Such ornate objects show how military equipment could also display status. Comparable cases were used beyond the Pontic steppe: Achaemenid Persian warriors are shown with them, and Indo-Greek mounted archers adopted the bow and case around 100 BCE. These transfers reflect the circulation of equipment, not a single army persisting across regions and centuries.

Riders used their balance and control of the horse while both hands worked the bow. They had no stirrups. Soft saddles known especially from the Altai supported the rider with padded panels and front and rear supports, rather than the high wooden saddle tree of later designs. The detailed preserved examples come from Pazyryk, where leather and stuffing survived in frozen graves.

Weapons, armour and the resources behind them

Archery did not leave Scythian warriors without weapons for close combat. Their arms included iron spears, swords and daggers, as well as axes and pick-like weapons. Small shields could be made of hide, wicker or wood and reinforced with iron strips. The mix of weapons allowed fighters to meet different situations, from attacks at a distance to a close engagement.

Protection varied with wealth and access to equipment. Aristocrats could wear scale armour: small plates of bone, bronze or iron sewn along their edges onto leather. Scale armour reflected contact with West Asian military practices. Other warriors used leather or hide protection. Helmets also changed over time. Caucasian-made bronze helmets were followed in the 6th century BCE by Greek-made types, while helmets assembled from metal scales appeared later in that century. Greek greaves, which protected the lower legs, were imported from the 5th century BCE. Imported helmets and greaves added new forms of protection to locally available equipment.

Manufacture drew on regional materials and specialist labour. Workshops in the forest-steppe produced weapons and horse equipment during the early Scythian period. Later, Kamianka became an important centre for metalworking. Contact with West Asia brought Scythians experience with iron weapons and scale armour; trade and exchange with Greek communities supplied additional equipment and styles. The military capacity of the kingdom therefore rested not only on riders, but also on craftspeople, access to metals and networks connecting the steppe with settled regions.

Command, recruitment and campaigning

Royal leaders coordinated forces drawn from their followers and allied communities. Herodotus describes three Scythian divisions responding to Darius’s invasion, each under its own leader. This gave the defence more than one mobile body, able to withdraw and operate across different areas instead of waiting in a single position.

A mounted archer needed repeated practice in controlling a horse, reaching arrows and judging a moving target. Equipment reflected resources: elite warriors could obtain metal armour and decorated cases, while others had simpler gear. Campaigns also required people to handle animals and supplies, alongside the armed riders.

Mounted archers fought in mass formations and used feigned flight, retreating in a way that could draw pursuers into an unfavourable position. These tactics made mobility a weapon in itself. Steppe campaigning also depended on access to horses and the resources of a society built around pastoral herds, while settled agricultural communities formed part of the wider economic world of the kingdom.

Scythian forces took part in more than warfare on the Pontic steppe. In the 7th century BCE, Scythian groups allied with powers in West Asia and served as mercenaries. Their campaigns there brought them into contact with iron weapons and armour practices that later shaped equipment in the steppe. From the mid-6th century BCE, Greek communities around the Black Sea also employed Scythians as mounted archers. In a later example, the Bosporan king Leukon used Scythian cavalry in the capture of Theodosia. Such service shows that mounted archers could be incorporated into the forces of other states as well as fight under Scythian leaders.

Campaigns, regional labels and later change

Around 513 BCE, Darius’s European expedition crossed the Danube. Herodotus describes Scythian forces withdrawing with their herds and denying the invaders an easy battle. The advancing Persians faced increasing supply difficulties and eventually retreated. This was a different operation from Darius’s earlier campaign against the eastern pointed-cap Saka recorded at Behistun.

Athens maintained a separate group known as Scythian archers in the fifth and early fourth centuries BCE. They were public slaves used for guarding and arrests; Athenian comedy shows magistrates summoning them to enforce orders. Their duties belonged to the institutions of a Greek city, whereas Pontic warfare drew on mounted forces and princely alliances.

Pontic Scythian power declined through military defeats and pressure from incoming Sarmatian groups. King Ateas was killed in a battle against the Macedonian king Philip II in 339 BCE, and the kingdom later collapsed in the early 3rd century BCE. Sarmatian history marks a transition in control of the Pontic steppe, not a continuation of the Scythian kingdom under another name. Later Indo-Scythian kingdoms also require their own regional context rather than being treated as the same army carried forward from the Black Sea.

For the wider setting, see Scythian historical context.