Knights Templar Privileges: Churches, Jurisdiction and Local Communities

From its beginnings around 1119 until its suppression in 1312, the Knights Templar combined religious life with a military role. Its houses and estates extended from the Holy Land across European provinces, including Iberia. Papal privileges gave the order unusual control over its own religious affairs and limited some claims by local authorities. Yet the Templars were not detached from surrounding societies: they depended on grants from rulers and nobles, managed estates, and dealt with people who worked on or used their properties.

These arrangements concerned the order’s position, not a universal Templar law for civilians. The meaning of a privilege also depended on its terms. Protection from a particular tax or legal claim did not amount to immunity from every local authority, while rights over churches and tithes were qualified by protections retained for bishops.

On this page5 sections

Papal protection and the settlement of 1139

On 29 March 1139, Pope Innocent II issued the papal bull Omne datum optimum. A bull was a formal papal decree. It confirmed the Templars as an order, approved their religious rule and placed their houses and possessions under the protection of the Holy See, the central authority of the Catholic Church.

The decree helped define whom the Templars answered to. It prohibited others from demanding the kinds of oaths and homage by which laypeople acknowledged a secular lord. This mattered because the order held land within territories governed by kings and nobles, but its members were not simply another body of vassals. Its formal religious superior was the pope. The bull also gave the order’s leaders authority to remove members deemed unworthy.

Papal protection strengthened the order’s control over its personnel and property. Local rulers nevertheless held surrounding jurisdictions, while bishops retained rights specified in the privilege. Managing a house therefore required both the papal grant and agreements with authorities in its own region.

Templar churches, chaplains and burial

Omne datum optimum allowed the Templars to have their own chaplains. Its provisions allowed clerics to be received under papal authority without the consent of the diocesan bishop, envisaged a period of probation before a cleric entered a house permanently, and allowed the order to dismiss priests who proved disruptive or of no use to it. A later papal grant, Militia Dei in 1145, permitted the order to build oratories, meaning chapels for prayer and religious services, and maintain burial grounds at its houses.

The clergy’s role was principally spiritual. They were to celebrate services and care for the souls of the brothers, rather than take charge of the house’s administration without the master’s consent. This arrangement gave the order a measure of religious independence from local diocesan structures while keeping worship within the Templar community’s own organisation.

Burial rights affected local clergy’s income and authority. In1152 the archbishop of Arles allowed the Templars to attach a cemetery to their chapel on condition that parishioners were not buried there without his permission. The right to a burial ground thus came with a negotiated boundary over who could use it.

In England, the Templars’ New Temple in London became a major religious centre for the order. Its round church, consecrated in 1185, was modelled on the Church of the Holy Sepulchre in Jerusalem. It served the Templars’ English headquarters, illustrating how a papally recognised religious community could establish its own prominent place of worship within a kingdom.

Tithes, church patronage and the rights of bishops

A tithe was an ecclesiastical due, traditionally associated with a portion of produce or income. The 1139 bull said that the Templars could not be compelled to pay tithes. It also confirmed their right to hold and benefit from tithes given to them with the consent of the relevant bishops. These were distinct provisions: exemption from paying a due did not grant an unrestricted right to collect dues from local people.

The distinction mattered because gifts of tithes could affect the income of churches and their clergy. The Templars faced criticism for receiving both tithes and alms, or charitable offerings. By requiring episcopal agreement for donated tithes and reserving bishops’ rights over offerings, the bull addressed a potential source of conflict without removing the order’s privileges.

Patronage created another connection between Templar houses and local churches. In England, the order received the advowson of St Clement Danes. An advowson was a patronage right associated with presenting a candidate for a church position. It gave the Templars a recognised role in the church’s appointment arrangements, while the appointment still belonged within the church’s procedures.

Estates and relationships with surrounding communities

The Templars’ local presence rested in part on land granted by rulers and noble patrons. In the Kingdom of Jerusalem, secular nobles granted the order castles and surrounding lands as part of frontier defence. In England, King Henry II granted property, including land near Castle Baynard in London. A survey of the order’s holdings by 1185 shows that its estates extended across numerous English counties. The English properties included farms and buildings; more broadly, the order also managed farms and vineyards.

These estates connected the order to people beyond its professed brothers. People who worked on Templar farms and vineyards, or dealt with the order’s financial services, could encounter it as a local landholder and institution as well as a religious and military organisation. The sources also show the order maintaining houses and, in some places, hospitals. Such activities placed Templar properties within local patterns of work, worship and exchange, even when the order’s formal authority ran directly to the pope.

The relationship was not simply one of papal privilege overriding local power. Templar houses depended on property granted by rulers and patrons, and their position could be affected by the policies of the governments around them. The English example shows both sides: Richard I confirmed the order’s holdings and granted exemptions from specified legal claims and levies, while English kings also conducted financial business with the Templars. Their London house served as a repository for royal treasure and Templar revenues; Henry III’s royal Wardrobe was located there in 1225. Such arrangements gave rulers practical reasons to cooperate with the order, even as its privileges could restrict some local claims.

Nor did the order’s internal discipline prevent disputes over its own administration. In 1188, Gilbert de Ogrestan, a Templar accused of embezzling money collected for the Saladin tithe, was severely punished by his master. The incident concerns an internal disciplinary response, not a dispute between the Templars and a local community, but it illustrates that the order’s financial and legal position did not remove the need to oversee its officials.

Suppression and the transfer of Templar property

When Pope Clement V suppressed the order in 1312, the Templars’ privileges and institutional arrangements came to an end. The papacy directed that most of the order’s property pass to the Knights Hospitaller, another military religious order. The transfer did not happen everywhere at once. In England, royal control and competing property claims delayed implementation for decades.

In Portugal, Templar properties and members were incorporated into the Order of Christ, founded in 1319. Elsewhere, the transfer of estates to the Hospitallers altered the institutions that owned and managed them. The transition was therefore more than the closure of individual houses: it changed who held the order’s lands and how those properties related to the communities around them.