Trade, Ports and the Rural Economy of the Crusader States

From the late eleventh century, Latin-ruled states established in the Levant after the First Crusade drew income from existing villages, towns and trading routes. The four states were the County of Edessa, the Principality of Antioch, the County of Tripoli and the Kingdom of Jerusalem. They shared economic connections but were not one government: the city of Edessa fell in 1144; a remnant of the county survived until 1150, while the other states endured for different lengths of time. This article focuses on the region’s farming, landholding, ports and exchange through the fall of Acre in 1291.

The western newcomers, often called Franks, ruled as a minority among a much larger population of local Christians, Muslims and Jews. They did not replace the established pattern of villages and towns. Instead, rulers and landholders relied on local producers and administrators, while merchants linked Levantine markets to the Mediterranean. The balance between farming and commerce varied by place and period, and changed sharply after the loss of much of the Kingdom of Jerusalem’s territory in 1187.

On this page5 sections

How countryside and coast were connected

Most of the region’s people lived in rural communities and made their living from the land. Their harvests supplied households and towns, and agricultural produce also generated rents and taxes. Urban markets brought together farmers, craftspeople and merchants. Coastal ports connected these markets to sea routes reaching Europe, while roads and inland routes linked the ports to the economies of Syria, Mesopotamia and the Nile region.

Trade therefore crossed political boundaries. The ports were not simply outlets for goods produced within Frankish territory: they also served wider regional commerce. In the towns, people of different religions and backgrounds traded crafts in the souks, or markets. Glassmaking and soap production were among the important urban industries. Antioch, Tripoli, Tyre and Beirut were centres of production and exchange, while Acre, Sidon and other coastal cities also served as commercial ports.

Land, harvests and rural labour

Wheat, barley, legumes, olives and grapes were important crops. Dates were grown in some areas, and sesame oil was among the goods exported from the region. Farming was largely carried out by local villagers, including Muslims and indigenous Christians. Frankish landholders drew income from rural estates through rents and taxes collected from dependent tenants.

Charters use the term villanus for a category of rural tenant. These villagers were bound to the land, but evidence indicates that their position differed from that of many western European serfs: they could marry outside their lord’s domain, hold and inherit property, and were not generally obliged to perform unpaid labour. Their obligations nevertheless included substantial payments to landholders. Charters indicate that rents could amount to between a quarter and half of a crop. The exact arrangements varied, and a share of produce was only one form of payment.

Muslim travellers also described taxes on rural households. In the late twelfth century, Ibn Jubayr reported a poll tax on Muslim villagers under Frankish rule, as well as a levy on produce from trees. Such payments were distinct from crop rents owed to a landholder. Together, rents and taxes transferred part of the value of rural production to lords and rulers, while the remaining harvest supported households and supplied markets.

Landholding combined European feudal practices with existing regional arrangements. A fief was land or income granted in return for service and loyalty. In the Kingdom of Jerusalem, royal territory was administered by royal officers, while nobles held lordships and could receive income from towns. Local community leaders, known in Arabic as a raʾīs (plural ruʾasāʾ), helped govern local populations and administer estates. These leaders could be intermediaries between villagers and a landholder who did not live on the estate.

Some agricultural ventures were organised through commercial concessions as well as ordinary lordships. Sugar cane, introduced to Palestine by the Arabs, was cultivated for export by Italian merchants holding concessions. Sugar production began at Tyre and continued in the thirteenth century; merchants could export sugar through Acre without duty. Accounts also describe enslaved people and dependent local workers, including Arabs and Syrians, labouring on sugar fields. Sugar estates combined labour in the fields with processing for an export market, unlike farms supplying ordinary grain and household crops.

Ports and Italian merchant communities

Italian maritime communities were central to the movement of goods, people and money. Venetians, Genoese and Pisans, alongside merchants from places such as Amalfi, Barcelona and Marseilles, established communities in ports including Acre, Tyre, Tripoli and Sidon. Their ships transported merchandise, pilgrims and military forces. The fees paid by pilgrims also helped support voyages, linking religious travel to the practical economics of shipping.

These communities were more than groups of visiting traders. They could hold property and exercise their own jurisdiction in distinct quarters, while remaining closely connected to their cities of origin. A self-governing merchant community of this kind was called a commune. Its commercial rights and political influence rested partly on support from its home city and partly on the naval and financial resources it could offer local rulers. Italian merchants came to dominate much of the shipping, transport and banking that connected the Levant to European markets.

Rulers granted privileges in return for those resources. Under the Pactum Warmundi, an agreement made in 1123 before the capture of Tyre in 1124, Venice received a third of Tyre and its territory, as well as exemption from taxes, in return for Venetian participation in the siege of the city. Such arrangements show how military help could be exchanged for lasting commercial advantages. They also gave Italian communities a stake in local politics and in the revenues generated by trade.

Port cities had institutions to manage some of the disputes created by commerce. The cour de la Fond, or market court, dealt with commercial disputes, while the cour de la Mer, or maritime court, handled matters at sea. The extent of merchant autonomy differed, but communal privileges meant that local rulers did not control every aspect of port life. Competition between trading communities could also turn violent. In 1256, rivalry between Genoese and Venetian merchants at Acre erupted into open conflict and spread to Tripoli and Antioch.

Goods, money and sources of revenue

Ships carried European goods east and Levantine products west. Woollen textiles from northern Europe and other finished goods entered eastern markets. Exports included textiles, with silk especially prized, as well as glass, dyestuffs, olives, wine, sesame oil and sugar. Trade joined the output of town workshops and agricultural estates to markets beyond the region. Merchant communities and their shipping networks profited from handling this exchange, while local producers supplied goods and paid rents or taxes.

Rulers and churches drew income from several sources: estate revenues, taxes on trade and markets, levies on industry and pilgrims, and tribute from neighbouring rulers. Tribute was a payment imposed through political agreements or as the price of peace. These sources did not benefit everyone equally. Landholders collected rents, rulers and religious institutions received revenues, and merchants could gain from privileged access to trade. Villagers and craftspeople, meanwhile, contributed through their work and the payments required of them.

Trade also operated with several monetary traditions in circulation. European silver coins were used alongside locally minted copper coins made in Arabic and Byzantine styles, and silver and gold dirhams and dinars. After 1124, the rulers of Jerusalem copied Egyptian dinars to produce a gold coin known as the bezant. Tyre, Sidon and Beirut also minted silver pennies and copper coins, but there was no single, consistently unified currency across the states. After the loss of the first Kingdom of Jerusalem in 1187, western European coins became more prominent in circulation.

Economic change after 1187

Saladin’s conquest of Jerusalem and much of the kingdom’s territory in 1187 transformed the economic balance. The Kingdom of Jerusalem was re-established around the coast after the Third Crusade, with Acre as its capital from 1191. Its reduced territory had a much smaller agricultural base than the earlier kingdom, although rural estates around the surviving coastal towns continued to contribute food and revenues. Commerce and the coastal ports consequently became more central to the surviving Frankish state.

The remaining ports could not replace larger commercial centres such as Alexandria and Constantinople, but they continued to connect the Levant with European markets. Their trade, revenues and political privileges sustained the coastal kingdom, even as its territory contracted. Antioch fell to the Mamluks in 1268, Tripoli in 1289, and Acre in 1291, ending Latin rule in the Levant.