The Fatimid Army: Recruitment, Pay and Fighting

The Fatimid army served a caliphate that ruled from North Africa and, after its conquest of Egypt in 969, made Egypt its political centre. Across the caliphate’s history, from 909 to 1171, its soldiers came from different communities and entered service under different conditions. Some joined through tribal and political loyalties; others were recruited as enslaved soldiers, hired as mercenaries or drawn from forces inherited from earlier governments. Pay, equipment and battlefield roles changed along with the Fatimids’ territory and political needs. The army’s diversity supplied useful skills and manpower, but competition over salaries, land and authority repeatedly weakened its cohesion.

On this page6 sections

From a Kutama-led movement to an imperial army

The early Fatimid state was built on the support of the Kutama, a Berber people who had joined the Ismaili Shia Muslim movement that backed the dynasty. Between 902 and 909, Kutama forces helped overthrow the Aghlabid rulers of Ifriqiya, a region centred on present-day Tunisia, and establish Fatimid rule there. They remained the army’s principal contingent in its early North African period, although the Fatimids also incorporated troops from defeated forces and recruited other groups.

After the conquest of Egypt in 969, the army’s centre of gravity moved east with the caliphate. Many Kutama accompanied the dynasty, while Sanhaja Berbers remained in Ifriqiya under the Zirid rulers, who initially upheld Fatimid authority there. Over the following century, that relationship weakened, and the Zirids eventually abandoned even nominal recognition of Fatimid overlordship. In Egypt, meanwhile, the Fatimids inherited some troops from the preceding Ikhshidid government and gained access to new sources of recruitment.

The expansion into Syria in the 970s brought the Fatimids into contact with military forces that made the limits of a Kutama-dominated army more apparent. After the defeat of the Turkic ruler Alptakin in 978, the caliphate took several thousand of his Turkish and Daylamite soldiers into service. Daylamites came from the mountainous region of northern Iran. This recruitment helped introduce heavily armoured cavalry and brought the Fatimid army closer to military practices common farther east. It also set the stage for prolonged rivalry between the Kutama and these new contingents.

Who served, and under what status

Recruitment brought soldiers with different languages, training and relationships to their commanders into Fatimid service. The Kutama were the early military core, while other groups entered the army at different times and in different circumstances. The Rūm, a term usually referring to Byzantine Greeks, included some people of European origin who had been bought or captured. They served both as enslaved soldiers and as mercenaries. The Ṣaqāliba, another broad term often applied to European slaves in Islamic lands, also appeared in military records, though their military duties are not clear; many were associated with court and administrative service.

Black African troops, referred to in the sources as Sudān or ʿabīd, became particularly important after Egypt became the Fatimids’ base. Sudān referred broadly to Black Africans, while ʿabīd literally meant slaves; these labels could conceal differences in an individual soldier’s origin and subsequent legal status. Earlier Egyptian governments had employed such troops, and the Fatimids drew on recruitment routes to the south of Egypt. Under al-Hakim, who ruled from 996 to 1021, the caliph bought enslaved Black Africans in large numbers and brought them into his service, setting them free as they entered it. Separate corps were formed, including a sword-armed personal guard. Enslavement and military service could therefore be connected, but the status of Fatimid soldiers varied: the army also included freedmen, mercenaries, tribal forces and other recruits.

Turkish soldiers likewise served under more than one status. Some of Alptakin’s men were freedmen; later, the Fatimids recruited enslaved Turkish soldiers, known as ghilmān, in large numbers. They became a privileged group with close ties to the regime. Armenians also entered Fatimid service and were known for their skill as archers, particularly after the Armenian commander Badr al-Jamali rose to power. Bedouin tribes from the Egyptian and Syrian deserts supplied auxiliaries, especially for particular campaigns. Volunteers could also be summoned for campaigns described as jihad, or armed religious struggle.

Some units formed around a particular commander or ruler rather than around a long-standing community. Such corps could acquire a strong identity and survive their founder’s period of service. Their loyalty could centre on the man who secured their pay and promotion. The army’s composition reflected the caliphate’s changing access to recruits, its political alliances and the military challenges of each period.

Command, units and inspection

The military dīwān, or administrative bureau, kept the government’s army affairs and recruitment under official supervision. Its troops were divided into contingents that often followed tribal or ethnic lines, and those formations were further divided into units based on ten. Other units took their names from the ruler or commander who raised them. These structures provided ways to organise forces, but divisions between contingents could also intensify competition.

Commanders held ranks distinguished, in part, by their insignia. The highest-ranking officers wore gold collars, a lower grade carried silver batons, and lesser commanders had no distinctive insignia. In the 11th century, each ethnic contingent apparently had an auditor who acted as an intermediary between the unit and the caliph. The most senior military commander commonly held authority over the army in Syria. Badr al-Jamali’s title, amīr al-juyūsh, meaning “commander of the armies,” became associated with the powerful viziers who governed the state in its later period.

The government inspected troops at musters, known as ʿarḍ. A muster assembled troops for inspection rather than for immediate fighting; it gave commanders an opportunity to review the men available before a major battle or campaign. Under al-Aziz, inspections were also held annually, though al-Hakim discontinued that regular practice. In the 12th century, the Fatimids established the Hujariyya, an elite cavalry corps developed from a palace school for officers. It recruited sons of military and civil elites for training intended to produce horsemen able to match Turkish cavalry. Trainees were organised in barracks, and graduates became a caliphal bodyguard.

Pay, land and the means to campaign

Maintaining soldiers was a major expense, and the government’s ability to pay them affected discipline and loyalty. The Fatimids at first paid much of the army directly from the treasury. In the early years of al-Hakim’s reign, salaries were paid eight times a year. By the reign of al-Mustansir, which began in 1036, payments had become monthly, a schedule retained until the end of the dynasty.

An iqṭāʿ was an assignment of revenue from land that supported a soldier or group in return for service. The income came from agricultural taxation; an assignment was not an outright transfer of ownership of the fields or of the cultivators who worked them. Under al-Hakim, even ordinary troops received them. Bedouin companies could be assigned grants collectively, while regular soldiers received individual allocations. The lands assigned to Bedouin groups were often less productive and were supplemented with money. The grants provided income for military service; they did not, in the Fatimid system described in the sources, give their holders the local administrative powers associated with some other states. Bedouin troops also received regular stipends.

After Badr al-Jamali took control in January 1074, revenue assignments became more prominent in the maintenance of soldiers. The recipient, called a muqṭāʿ, received a fixed stipend from the grant, while most of its revenue remained with the state. Assigning a defined income connected military maintenance to the countryside while leaving the central administration a claim on the remaining revenue. This differed from the more extensive military control over agricultural income established under the succeeding Ayyubid rulers. Some commanders also used income from their estates to maintain armed retinues for service on campaign.

Financial strain made both systems difficult to sustain. From the late 10th century, troops were at times left unpaid. Soldiers rioted and plundered Cairo in 1024, and in 1036 one angry soldier threw a javelin that nearly struck al-Mustansir. During the mid-11th-century crisis, pay disputes helped fuel disorder and the fragmentation of the army. Plagues killed many peasants, and some soldiers turned to farming their grants. The decline in cultivation contributed to problems with the land’s productivity, which Badr’s reforms sought to address.

The state also provided weapons, horses and pack animals. Weapons could be bought in Cairo’s markets or made in workshops under state control; arms were also imported. Horses carried cavalrymen, while camels transported baggage and supplies. A force moving between Egypt and Palestine had to keep both men and animals provisioned, so military expenditure extended beyond a soldier’s salary to equipment, mounts and transport.

Weapons and battlefield roles

Early Kutama troops used swords, bows and, especially, javelins, light spears that could be thrown at an opponent. They were usually not heavily armoured. The encounter with Alptakin’s forces in Syria during the 970s encouraged a change in equipment and force composition. After the Fatimids incorporated Turks and Daylamites, heavily armoured cavalry became a regular feature. Both rider and horse could wear chain mail, armour made from linked metal rings, a marked contrast with the lightly equipped early Kutama forces.

Even after cavalry gained prestige, infantry, the troops fighting on foot, remained the main body of many Fatimid field armies during the 11th century. Cavalry, often reinforced by Bedouin auxiliaries, generally took position on the flanks. In the 12th century, infantry and cavalry alike continued to use swords and javelins, alongside a wider range of weapons. During the North African period, Fatimid forces also used stone-throwing siege engines and siege towers. The engines hurled missiles against a defended position, while towers brought attackers up toward the height of its walls. Such equipment required transport and preparation in addition to the troops conducting the assault.

Military service was not confined to fighting in field armies. Some soldiers served in garrisons, while records also refer to marines. A Ṣaqāliba commander, Sabir al-Fata, led naval raids against the Italian coasts. Garrison soldiers held positions over time, whereas field forces and shipboard fighters had to be moved and supplied for particular operations.

Campaigns, rivalries and political change

The army’s performance varied over time and across regions. In its early decades, it was a revolutionary force whose internal rivalries and indiscipline contributed to unsuccessful attempts to conquer Egypt. By the 950s, Fatimid forces performed well in conflicts in North Africa and against the Byzantine Empire in Sicily. The 969 conquest of Egypt was a political watershed, but expansion into the Levant brought the army up against Turkish, Byzantine and other opponents it often struggled to defeat.

As new Turkish and Daylamite troops gained influence, rivalry with the Kutama became increasingly bitter. The arrival of Black African troops added another powerful contingent. Under al-Hakim, officers from these forces were at times placed in command of Turks, in a deliberate challenge to Turkish insubordination. This contributed to a major clash between the groups in 1020. Soldiers’ disputes with civilian residents also led to plunder and violence, which further damaged the army’s relations with the population it was meant to defend.

Competition reached a crisis in 1062–1073, when Turkish forces became the dominant power in the capital and the Fatimid state nearly collapsed. Badr al-Jamali’s arrival in January 1074 restored a measure of control, but changed the balance of power. He reduced the position of the caliph and governed through a powerful vizierate. His reforms also altered the army: he dismissed the remaining Kutama and disbanded existing Black African regiments he considered too loyal to the caliph, while building his own military following.

After Badr’s death, Black African troops again became a mainstay of the Fatimid army, alongside Armenians, who had grown in prominence under Badr and his successors. In the dynasty’s final period, these groups provided much of the army, but their combined strength did not secure the regime. In 1169, Fatimid Black African and Armenian forces opposed Saladin and were defeated in the conflict known as the Battle of the Blacks. The surviving Fatimid military was almost entirely dismantled as Saladin consolidated his power and abolished the dynasty in 1171.