Crime and Safety in Ancient Greece: Theft, Violence, Coercion, and Public Order

Greek cities handled theft, assault, coercion and public disorder through local magistrates, citizen courts and household intervention. The richest descriptions of enforcement come from Classical Athens: the Constitution of the Athenians describes magistrates, audits and court procedures, while Lysias’s speeches show how litigants argued before citizen juries. The examples also draw on the fifth-century law inscription at Gortyn on Crete and Polybius’s Hellenistic account of raiding in Messenia, in the southwestern Peloponnese of Greece.

On this page5 sections

Household and neighbourhood responses

Relatives, friends and neighbours could intervene before a case reached a magistrate. In his defense speech Against Simon, delivered around 393 BCE, an Athenian speaker says that Simon came drunk to his house at night, broke the doors and entered the women’s rooms. People who arrived, including some of Simon’s own companions, forced him to leave. The speaker later says that Simon threw stones during a quarrel, striking another man in the forehead. After the alleged assault, the speaker says he stayed silent because he feared ridicule, then left Athens for a time. When Simon later tried to seize the boy around whom their dispute revolved, bystanders in a fuller’s shop witnessed the confrontation. The speaker’s account places his companions, neighbours and shop witnesses at different stages of the quarrel, giving his jury a sequence of people who could confirm parts of his story.

Enforcement and public order in Athens

Athens assigned enforcement tasks to magistrates and enslaved people owned by the city. Under the procedure called apagoge, an apprehended suspect in certain categories could be brought directly before the Eleven, magistrates selected by lot who supervised the state prison. Aristotle’s Constitution of the Athenians names thieves, kidnappers and pickpockets: if a prisoner confessed, the Eleven executed him; if he denied the charge, they brought him to court, where an acquittal meant release.

A separate group helped maintain order in civic spaces. By the mid-fifth century BCE, Athens employed about 300 enslaved Scythian men as public archers. Historian David Pritchard distinguishes them from the citizen military archer corps: the public slaves helped the Council manage the Assembly, removed unruly participants and made arrests when ordered. Their assigned role was civic enforcement inside the Assembly, not military service in the city’s archer corps.

The ten astynomoi, or city commissioners, split their work between Athens and Piraeus, the city’s port. They kept streets clear of buildings, barriers and outward-opening doors and arranged for state slaves to remove corpses left in public streets. Other magistrates inspected market goods and checked that sellers used fair weights and measures.

Public officials also faced a formal accounting process. The Constitution of the Athenians says that ten auditors and ten assistants reviewed accounts from every officeholder and brought cases before the courts. A magistrate convicted of embezzlement had to repay ten times the sum taken; a conviction for taking bribes also brought tenfold repayment. For private disputes, the Forty handled claims worth up to ten drachmas; larger claims went to arbitrators, who tried to bring the parties to agreement and otherwise issued a decision. If either party appealed, the arbitrator’s decision, the evidence, pleadings and laws cited were sealed and passed to a citizen court. The jury could consider only the material presented in arbitration.

Homicide and legal justification

Athenian homicide cases followed different routes according to the alleged act and the victim’s status. The archon basileus, a religious magistrate who oversaw sacrifices and sacred rites, received homicide actions. Deliberate killing and intentional wounding were heard by the Areopagus; involuntary killing and cases involving the death of an enslaved person, resident foreigner or foreigner went to the Palladion court. When a defendant admitted the killing but claimed legal justification, such as killing an adulterer caught in the act, the case went to the Delphinion court. The distinction meant that the defendant’s account of intention and justification affected where the case was heard.

Lysias’s On the Murder of Eratosthenes is an example of that defense. Euphiletos does not deny killing Eratosthenes. He asks the jury to accept that he caught the man committing adultery and acted under the law. His speech recounts the friends and witnesses present at the confrontation and argues against the relatives’ claim that the killing was planned. For the courts and legal routes in greater detail, see Greek law and justice.

Status and coercion at Gortyn

Gortyn, on the Greek island of Crete, preserves a fifth-century BCE law inscription assigning different fines for sexual violence according to the status of the people involved. In the surviving translation, rape of a free man or woman carried a fine of 100 staters; when a slave raped a free person, the fine doubled. A free man’s forced intercourse with a female house-slave carried a far smaller penalty of two staters. A stater was a coin and unit of value. The provisions make visible a sharp hierarchy in the legal value assigned to victims. These Gortynian status categories make a local contrast with Athens, where a victim’s status could also determine the court that heard a homicide case.

Risk on roads, at sea and in wartime

Thucydides, recounting early Greek history, describes coastal and island communities raiding unwalled settlements by sea.

A more specific Hellenistic example comes from Polybius’s account of the Social War, around 220 BCE. Polybius places the incident near Phigaleia in the western Peloponnese, close to Messenia. Dorimachus, an Aetolian official, allowed a band of brigands to raid allied Messenian flocks. The group then broke into country houses at night; at a farm called Chron’s, Polybius says, raiders killed people who resisted, bound the household slaves and carried them off with cattle. Messenian officials demanded compensation and the surrender of the killers, making the attacks a dispute between communities as well as a danger to households. For routes, lodging and preparation for journeys, see Greek travel.